Hi ZK committers,
I've come across recently that patch authors keep asking me to backport
their patches to active branches, because it was only submitted to the
master branch.
I think we should get into the habit of submitting every accepted PRs
to all active branches (today it's branch-3.8 and b
Shouldn't we only backport critical fixes into the non-mainline branch? The
whole idea is that that's the "stable" release while the mainline is the
most current...
Regards,
Patrick
On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 12:54 PM Andor Molnar wrote:
> Hi ZK committers,
>
> I've come across recently that patc
Do you mean handle 3.9 and 3.8 slightly differently and be more strict
on branch-3.8?
I can agree with that, but 3.9 can still receive more patches.
Andor
On Wed, 2024-03-20 at 13:16 -0700, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> Shouldn't we only backport critical fixes into the non-mainline
> branch? The
> w
Yes, that's what I mean. 3.9 is "current" - it should track latest changes.
3.8 is "stable" - it should only get critical fixes.
Patrick
On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 1:50 PM Andor Molnar wrote:
> Do you mean handle 3.9 and 3.8 slightly differently and be more strict
> on branch-3.8?
>
> I can agree
