[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1208) Ephemeral node not removed after the client session is long gone

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1208?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13148335#comment-13148335 ] Mahadev konar commented on ZOOKEEPER-1208: -- Sorry for being out of action

[jira] [Created] (ZOOKEEPER-1297) Add stat information to create() call

Add stat information to create() call - Key: ZOOKEEPER-1297 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1297 Project: ZooKeeper Issue Type: New Feature Components: java client

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1208) Ephemeral node not removed after the client session is long gone

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1208?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13148517#comment-13148517 ] Camille Fournier commented on ZOOKEEPER-1208: - I like the fix, Pat.

Re: ephemeral node not deleted after client session closed

Pat, That is excellent turnaround ! I will take a look at the running the test as well as your patch. Will be a good opportunity for me to start understanding the zookeeper codebase. Thanks again, Neha On Thursday, November 10, 2011, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote: Ok, patch posted that

[jira] [Updated] (ZOOKEEPER-1296) Add zookeeper-setup-conf.sh script

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eric Yang updated ZOOKEEPER-1296: - Attachment: ZOOKEEPER-1296-1.patch Added myid file creation. Add

Re: Review Request: BOOKKEEPER-108: add configuration support for BK

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/2771/ --- (Updated 2011-11-11 17:29:32.204949) Review request for bookkeeper. Changes

[jira] [Commented] (BOOKKEEPER-108) add configuration support for BK

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-108?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13148588#comment-13148588 ] jirapos...@reviews.apache.org commented on BOOKKEEPER-108: --

[jira] [Updated] (BOOKKEEPER-108) add configuration support for BK

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-108?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sijie Guo updated BOOKKEEPER-108: - Attachment: BOOKKEEPER-108.patch_v2 add configuration support for BK

Re: setting zookeeper heap size

I agree. I've been meaning to create a set of jiras for this, all related to resource availability/env, it's on my todo list (came up recently at a customer site). I see a number of things: 1) heap: a) sane default for max mem (easy), plus docs and such. b) turn on CMS/parallelGC by default c)

Failed: ZOOKEEPER-1296 PreCommit Build #785

Jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1296 Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-Build/785/ ### ## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE ###

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1296) Add zookeeper-setup-conf.sh script

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13148595#comment-13148595 ] Hadoop QA commented on ZOOKEEPER-1296: -- -1 overall. Here are the results of

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1208) Ephemeral node not removed after the client session is long gone

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1208?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13148597#comment-13148597 ] Patrick Hunt commented on ZOOKEEPER-1208: - @mahadev session id 0 just means to

Re: ephemeral node not deleted after client session closed

We always triage new issues as they come in (same when 1208 originally came in). However our ability to determine the cause is often bounded by the information provided by the user, which in this recent update was excellent and pointed out exactly the flaw. Kudos. We'll button up this issue

[jira] [Commented] (BOOKKEEPER-91) Bookkeeper and hedwig clients should not use log4j directly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-91?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13148613#comment-13148613 ] jirapos...@reviews.apache.org commented on BOOKKEEPER-91: -

[jira] [Assigned] (BOOKKEEPER-91) Bookkeeper and hedwig clients should not use log4j directly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-91?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ivan Kelly reassigned BOOKKEEPER-91: Assignee: Ivan Kelly Bookkeeper and hedwig clients should not use log4j directly

[jira] [Updated] (BOOKKEEPER-87) TestHedwigHub exhausts direct buffer memory with netty 3.2.4.Final

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-87?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ivan Kelly updated BOOKKEEPER-87: - Attachment: BOOKKEEPER-87.diff Patch increases the max heap for hedwig server testing.

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1208) Ephemeral node not removed after the client session is long gone

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1208?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13148634#comment-13148634 ] Mahadev konar commented on ZOOKEEPER-1208: -- You are right. I was worried abt

ZooKeeper_branch33_solaris - Build # 11 - Failure

See https://builds.apache.org/job/ZooKeeper_branch33_solaris/11/ ### ## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE ### Started by timer Building remotely on solaris1 Updating

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1296) Add zookeeper-setup-conf.sh script

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13148657#comment-13148657 ] Eric Yang commented on ZOOKEEPER-1296: -- Shell script change only. Tested

[jira] [Commented] (BOOKKEEPER-108) add configuration support for BK

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-108?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13148658#comment-13148658 ] jirapos...@reviews.apache.org commented on BOOKKEEPER-108: --

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1296) Add zookeeper-setup-conf.sh script

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13148692#comment-13148692 ] Patrick Hunt commented on ZOOKEEPER-1296: - fyi, here's another example of such

[jira] [Reopened] (ZOOKEEPER-1251) call checkSession at begin of PrepRequestProcessor.pRequest

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Patrick Hunt reopened ZOOKEEPER-1251: - Turns out there is a bug in this (found while testing ZOOKEEPER-1208). It does not

[jira] [Updated] (ZOOKEEPER-1208) Ephemeral node not removed after the client session is long gone

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1208?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Patrick Hunt updated ZOOKEEPER-1208: Attachment: ZOOKEEPER-1208_br34.patch Ephemeral node not removed after the client

[jira] [Updated] (ZOOKEEPER-1208) Ephemeral node not removed after the client session is long gone

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1208?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Patrick Hunt updated ZOOKEEPER-1208: Attachment: ZOOKEEPER-1208_trunk.patch Ephemeral node not removed after the

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1297) Add stat information to create() call

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1297?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13148732#comment-13148732 ] Patrick Hunt commented on ZOOKEEPER-1297: - Does seem like an oversight to me.

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1251) call checkSession at begin of PrepRequestProcessor.pRequest

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13148738#comment-13148738 ] Patrick Hunt commented on ZOOKEEPER-1251: - @thomas I'd suggest write a test

Success: ZOOKEEPER-1208 PreCommit Build #786

Jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1208 Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-Build/786/ ### ## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE ###

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1208) Ephemeral node not removed after the client session is long gone

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1208?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13148743#comment-13148743 ] Hadoop QA commented on ZOOKEEPER-1208: -- +1 overall. Here are the results of

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1251) call checkSession at begin of PrepRequestProcessor.pRequest

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13148750#comment-13148750 ] Patrick Hunt commented on ZOOKEEPER-1251: - @thomas I checked your assertion

[jira] [Updated] (ZOOKEEPER-1251) call checkSession at begin of PrepRequestProcessor.pRequest

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Patrick Hunt updated ZOOKEEPER-1251: Attachment: update_to_1208_showingreadfailure.patch Apply

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1283) building 3.3 branch fails with Ant 1.8.2 (success with 1.7.1 though)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1283?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13148757#comment-13148757 ] Patrick Hunt commented on ZOOKEEPER-1283: - Committers: slease review this for

[jira] [Updated] (ZOOKEEPER-1277) servers stop serving when lower 32bits of zxid roll over

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Patrick Hunt updated ZOOKEEPER-1277: Attachment: ZOOKEEPER-1277_br33.patch servers stop serving when lower 32bits of

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1278) acceptedEpoch not handling zxid rollover in lower 32bits

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1278?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13148922#comment-13148922 ] Patrick Hunt commented on ZOOKEEPER-1278: - I just tested this with my test

[jira] [Updated] (ZOOKEEPER-1278) acceptedEpoch not handling zxid rollover in lower 32bits

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1278?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Patrick Hunt updated ZOOKEEPER-1278: Attachment: ZOOKEEPER-1278_br34.patch This patch passes the simple test, however the

[jira] [Assigned] (ZOOKEEPER-1278) acceptedEpoch not handling zxid rollover in lower 32bits

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1278?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Patrick Hunt reassigned ZOOKEEPER-1278: --- Assignee: Patrick Hunt acceptedEpoch not handling zxid rollover in lower

Failed: ZOOKEEPER-1277 PreCommit Build #787

Jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1277 Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-Build/787/ ### ## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE ###

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1277) servers stop serving when lower 32bits of zxid roll over

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13148924#comment-13148924 ] Hadoop QA commented on ZOOKEEPER-1277: -- -1 overall. Here are the results of