See https://builds.apache.org/job/ZooKeeper-trunk-ibm6/512/
###
## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE
###
[...truncated 338024 lines...]
[junit] 2014-06-05 09:12:47,096
See https://builds.apache.org/job/ZooKeeper-trunk-jdk8/35/
###
## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE
###
[...truncated 292865 lines...]
[junit] 2014-06-05 12:54:46,872
Marshall McMullen created ZOOKEEPER-1934:
Summary: Stale data received from sync'd ensemble peer
Key: ZOOKEEPER-1934
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1934
Project:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1934?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Marshall McMullen updated ZOOKEEPER-1934:
-
Attachment: node5.log
node4.log
node3.log
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1934?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14019389#comment-14019389
]
Marshall McMullen commented on ZOOKEEPER-1934:
--
Diffing the zktreeutil
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1934?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14019392#comment-14019392
]
Marshall McMullen commented on ZOOKEEPER-1934:
--
Yet before we grabbed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1934?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Marshall McMullen updated ZOOKEEPER-1934:
-
Description:
In our regression testing we encountered an error wherein we
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1934?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Marshall McMullen updated ZOOKEEPER-1934:
-
Description:
In our regression testing we encountered an error wherein we
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1934?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Marshall McMullen updated ZOOKEEPER-1934:
-
Description:
In our regression testing we encountered an error wherein we
Hi guys,
There's currently 3 jiras outstanding before I can cut a release of
4.2.3, BOOKKEEPER-765,766767. The changes are all
straightforward. Could some of you take a look.
Regards
Ivan
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-765?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14018679#comment-14018679
]
Flavio Junqueira commented on BOOKKEEPER-765:
-
I'm wondering if falling
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-765?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14018708#comment-14018708
]
Ivan Kelly commented on BOOKKEEPER-765:
---
all we need is the java executable.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-766?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14018752#comment-14018752
]
Hudson commented on BOOKKEEPER-766:
---
SUCCESS: Integrated in bookkeeper-trunk #660
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-767?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14018834#comment-14018834
]
Flavio Junqueira commented on BOOKKEEPER-767:
-
Ok, I was able to repro
Guys,
I'll need a report for June by June 11. Ivan, would you be able to produce a
draft?
Thanks,
-Flavio
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-582?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14019110#comment-14019110
]
Sijie Guo commented on BOOKKEEPER-582:
--
Thanks [~ikelly] for the summary. [~fpj]
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-767?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14019360#comment-14019360
]
Flavio Junqueira commented on BOOKKEEPER-767:
-
I have checked the 4.2
Hi,
I tested the bookkeeper benchmark on one disk,
the result is
290376 completions in 62000 seconds: 4683 ops/sec
99th percentile latency: 1793.1247832959698
95th percentile latency: 1708.9804397097917
I think it should be 62000 milliseconds.
Plz check the code in BenchThroughputLatency.java,
Yup. it should be 'milliseconds'. Do you want to create a patch to fix this?
- Sijie
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 5:49 PM, Jaln valiant...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I tested the bookkeeper benchmark on one disk,
the result is
290376 completions in 62000 seconds: 4683 ops/sec
99th percentile latency:
Sounds good, I'll try.
Best,
Jaln
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 5, 2014, at 9:20 PM, Sijie Guo guosi...@gmail.com wrote:
Yup. it should be 'milliseconds'. Do you want to create a patch to fix this?
- Sijie
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 5:49 PM, Jaln valiant...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I
We should document the step on how to run test somewhere. Due to the usage
of maven-shade-plugin for backward compatibility testing, ways like 'mvn
test -pl :bookkeeper-server -am' would fail on a fresh checkout. since the
shade plugin is only able to run at 'package' phase. if we don't run 'mvn
I run locally, like /bin/bookkeeper localbookie 3
the code from rakesh seems not working, bc there are more than places for
matching the directory.
so, in my test, I modified all the places (I don't know where is the major
place)
Thanks,
Jaln
22 matches
Mail list logo