Re: Re: Hadoop logo
+1, I have created a ticket for this: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3648. If someone is interested in, please pick it ip. BTW: the github project description(Mirror of Apache Hadoop ZooKeeper) may also needs a update. - Original Message - From: Michael Han To: dev@zookeeper.apache.org Subject: Re: Hadoop logo Date: 2019-12-13 09:31 +1 I do see a book keeper gif file in repo, should remove that one too. On my wish list: redesign of the ZooKeeper logo :) On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 7:44 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > +1 > > Maybe we should also check if we have old pages about Bookkeeper project. > It was a subproject of ZK but now it is a (great) top level independent > project > > Enrico > > Il gio 12 dic 2019, 16:38 Flavio Junqueira ha scritto: > > > ZooKeeper was a subproject of Hadoop in the early Apache days, and we > > still carry that flag... ;-) > > > > -Flavio > > > > > On 12 Dec 2019, at 16:16, Norbert Kalmar > > > wrote: > > > > > > Oh, wow, I didn't even notice that until now. > > > Makes sense, knowing a lot of the time ZK is used "standalone" (I mean > > > outside of any hadoop ecosystem). > > > > > > Regards, > > > Norbert > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 2:52 PM Flavio Junqueira > wrote: > > > > > >> Should we remove that Hadoop logo from the documentation? It has been > a > > >> while that we aren't a subproject of Hadoop any longer. > > >> > > >> -Flavio > > > > >
[jira] [Created] (ZOOKEEPER-3648) remove Hadoop logo in the ZooKeeper documentation
maoling created ZOOKEEPER-3648: -- Summary: remove Hadoop logo in the ZooKeeper documentation Key: ZOOKEEPER-3648 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3648 Project: ZooKeeper Issue Type: Improvement Components: documentation Reporter: maoling Fix For: 3.6.0 -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
Re: Hadoop logo
+1 I do see a book keeper gif file in repo, should remove that one too. On my wish list: redesign of the ZooKeeper logo :) On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 7:44 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > +1 > > Maybe we should also check if we have old pages about Bookkeeper project. > It was a subproject of ZK but now it is a (great) top level independent > project > > Enrico > > Il gio 12 dic 2019, 16:38 Flavio Junqueira ha scritto: > > > ZooKeeper was a subproject of Hadoop in the early Apache days, and we > > still carry that flag... ;-) > > > > -Flavio > > > > > On 12 Dec 2019, at 16:16, Norbert Kalmar > > > wrote: > > > > > > Oh, wow, I didn't even notice that until now. > > > Makes sense, knowing a lot of the time ZK is used "standalone" (I mean > > > outside of any hadoop ecosystem). > > > > > > Regards, > > > Norbert > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 2:52 PM Flavio Junqueira > wrote: > > > > > >> Should we remove that Hadoop logo from the documentation? It has been > a > > >> while that we aren't a subproject of Hadoop any longer. > > >> > > >> -Flavio > > > > >
Re: Hadoop logo
+1 Maybe we should also check if we have old pages about Bookkeeper project. It was a subproject of ZK but now it is a (great) top level independent project Enrico Il gio 12 dic 2019, 16:38 Flavio Junqueira ha scritto: > ZooKeeper was a subproject of Hadoop in the early Apache days, and we > still carry that flag... ;-) > > -Flavio > > > On 12 Dec 2019, at 16:16, Norbert Kalmar > wrote: > > > > Oh, wow, I didn't even notice that until now. > > Makes sense, knowing a lot of the time ZK is used "standalone" (I mean > > outside of any hadoop ecosystem). > > > > Regards, > > Norbert > > > > On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 2:52 PM Flavio Junqueira wrote: > > > >> Should we remove that Hadoop logo from the documentation? It has been a > >> while that we aren't a subproject of Hadoop any longer. > >> > >> -Flavio > >
Re: Hadoop logo
ZooKeeper was a subproject of Hadoop in the early Apache days, and we still carry that flag... ;-) -Flavio > On 12 Dec 2019, at 16:16, Norbert Kalmar wrote: > > Oh, wow, I didn't even notice that until now. > Makes sense, knowing a lot of the time ZK is used "standalone" (I mean > outside of any hadoop ecosystem). > > Regards, > Norbert > > On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 2:52 PM Flavio Junqueira wrote: > >> Should we remove that Hadoop logo from the documentation? It has been a >> while that we aren't a subproject of Hadoop any longer. >> >> -Flavio
Re: Hadoop logo
Oh, wow, I didn't even notice that until now. Makes sense, knowing a lot of the time ZK is used "standalone" (I mean outside of any hadoop ecosystem). Regards, Norbert On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 2:52 PM Flavio Junqueira wrote: > Should we remove that Hadoop logo from the documentation? It has been a > while that we aren't a subproject of Hadoop any longer. > > -Flavio
Hadoop logo
Should we remove that Hadoop logo from the documentation? It has been a while that we aren't a subproject of Hadoop any longer. -Flavio
[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2551) Remove Hadoop Logo from ZooKeeper documentation
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2551?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16471085#comment-16471085 ] Hadoop QA commented on ZOOKEEPER-2551: -- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12829255/ZOOKEEPER-2551-01.patch against trunk revision 2fa315b7d0ed65828479fcdcc9e76ca8552fba4a. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +0 tests included. The patch appears to be a documentation patch that doesn't require tests. -1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch. Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-Build/3684//console This message is automatically generated. > Remove Hadoop Logo from ZooKeeper documentation > --- > > Key: ZOOKEEPER-2551 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2551 > Project: ZooKeeper > Issue Type: Bug > Components: documentation >Reporter: Mohammad Arshad >Assignee: Mohammad Arshad >Priority: Major > Fix For: 3.6.0, 3.5.5 > > Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-2551-01.patch > > > ZooKeeper documentation has hadoop logo on each page's header. There is no > significance to put the hadoop logo on ZooKeeper project. So hadoop logo > should be removed from Zookeeper as ZooKeeper is independent of hadoop > project, -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (ZOOKEEPER-2551) Remove Hadoop Logo from ZooKeeper documentation
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2551?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael Han updated ZOOKEEPER-2551: --- Fix Version/s: (was: 3.5.3) 3.6.0 3.5.4 > Remove Hadoop Logo from ZooKeeper documentation > --- > > Key: ZOOKEEPER-2551 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2551 > Project: ZooKeeper > Issue Type: Bug > Components: documentation >Reporter: Mohammad Arshad >Assignee: Mohammad Arshad > Fix For: 3.5.4, 3.6.0 > > Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-2551-01.patch > > > ZooKeeper documentation has hadoop logo on each page's header. There is no > significance to put the hadoop logo on ZooKeeper project. So hadoop logo > should be removed from Zookeeper as ZooKeeper is independent of hadoop > project, -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)
[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2551) Remove Hadoop Logo from ZooKeeper documentation
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2551?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15504442#comment-15504442 ] Hadoop QA commented on ZOOKEEPER-2551: -- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12829255/ZOOKEEPER-2551-01.patch against trunk revision ec20c5434cc8a334b3fd25e27d26dccf4793c8f3. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +0 tests included. The patch appears to be a documentation patch that doesn't require tests. -1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch. Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-Build/3442//console This message is automatically generated. > Remove Hadoop Logo from ZooKeeper documentation > --- > > Key: ZOOKEEPER-2551 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2551 > Project: ZooKeeper > Issue Type: Bug > Components: documentation >Reporter: Arshad Mohammad >Assignee: Arshad Mohammad > Fix For: 3.5.3 > > Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-2551-01.patch > > > ZooKeeper documentation has hadoop logo on each page's header. There is no > significance to put the hadoop logo on ZooKeeper project. So hadoop logo > should be removed from Zookeeper as ZooKeeper is independent of hadoop > project, -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2551) Remove Hadoop Logo from ZooKeeper documentation
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2551?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15504413#comment-15504413 ] Arshad Mohammad commented on ZOOKEEPER-2551: Some binary files are added and modified so it is expected that CI check will fail. Patch can not be applied. Following are done in the patch ZOOKEEPER-2551-01.patch # removed hadoop-logo.jpg from src/docs/src/documentation/resources/images and generated doc location docs/images/ # Changed the group project from hadoop to apache # downloaded http://apache.org/images/feather-small.gif added it to src/docs/src/documentation/resources/images folder. After document generation same file will go in docs/images folder as well and it should be checked-in there. > Remove Hadoop Logo from ZooKeeper documentation > --- > > Key: ZOOKEEPER-2551 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2551 > Project: ZooKeeper > Issue Type: Bug > Components: documentation >Reporter: Arshad Mohammad >Assignee: Arshad Mohammad > Fix For: 3.5.3 > > Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-2551-01.patch > > > ZooKeeper documentation has hadoop logo on each page's header. There is no > significance to put the hadoop logo on ZooKeeper project. So hadoop logo > should be removed from Zookeeper as ZooKeeper is independent of hadoop > project, -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (ZOOKEEPER-2551) Remove Hadoop Logo from ZooKeeper documentation
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2551?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Arshad Mohammad updated ZOOKEEPER-2551: --- Attachment: ZOOKEEPER-2551-01.patch > Remove Hadoop Logo from ZooKeeper documentation > --- > > Key: ZOOKEEPER-2551 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2551 > Project: ZooKeeper > Issue Type: Bug > Components: documentation >Reporter: Arshad Mohammad >Assignee: Arshad Mohammad > Fix For: 3.5.3 > > Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-2551-01.patch > > > ZooKeeper documentation has hadoop logo on each page's header. There is no > significance to put the hadoop logo on ZooKeeper project. So hadoop logo > should be removed from Zookeeper as ZooKeeper is independent of hadoop > project, -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
Re: Hadoop logo in docs
Thanks, Arshad. -Flavio > On 05 Sep 2016, at 08:02, Arshad Mohammad <arshad.mohamma...@gmail.com> wrote: > > yes, in each header. > I created ZOOKEEPER-2551 to remove the hadoop logo. > > -Arshad > > On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 11:21 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote: > >> So in the header for each doc page? e.g. >> http://zookeeper.apache.org/doc/r3.4.9/zookeeperOver.html >> >> I don't see why we couldn't remove it. Perhaps for seo reasons? >> >> Patrick >> >> On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 10:47 PM, Arshad Mohammad < >> arshad.mohamma...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> The log is at only one place. >>> >>> In the code: in src\docs\src\documentation\skinconf.xml >>> >>> Hadoop >>> Apache Hadoop >>> http://hadoop.apache.org/ >>> images/hadoop-logo.jpg >>> >>> In generated doc >>> [image: Inline image 2] >>> >>> -Arshad >>> >>> On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 9:51 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>>> What's an example? Can you provide some links? >>>> >>>> Patrick >>>> >>>> On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 2:00 AM, Flavio Junqueira <f...@apache.org> >> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Is there any particular reason for having the Hadoop logo in our >> docs? I >>>>> understand that it is there for historical reasons, but is there any >>>> other >>>>> reason, could we consider removing it? >>>>> >>>>> -Flavio >>>> >>> >>> >>
Re: Hadoop logo in docs
yes, in each header. I created ZOOKEEPER-2551 to remove the hadoop logo. -Arshad On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 11:21 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote: > So in the header for each doc page? e.g. > http://zookeeper.apache.org/doc/r3.4.9/zookeeperOver.html > > I don't see why we couldn't remove it. Perhaps for seo reasons? > > Patrick > > On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 10:47 PM, Arshad Mohammad < > arshad.mohamma...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > The log is at only one place. > > > > In the code: in src\docs\src\documentation\skinconf.xml > > > > Hadoop > > Apache Hadoop > > http://hadoop.apache.org/ > > images/hadoop-logo.jpg > > > > In generated doc > > [image: Inline image 2] > > > > -Arshad > > > > On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 9:51 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote: > > > >> What's an example? Can you provide some links? > >> > >> Patrick > >> > >> On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 2:00 AM, Flavio Junqueira <f...@apache.org> > wrote: > >> > >> > Is there any particular reason for having the Hadoop logo in our > docs? I > >> > understand that it is there for historical reasons, but is there any > >> other > >> > reason, could we consider removing it? > >> > > >> > -Flavio > >> > > > > >
[jira] [Created] (ZOOKEEPER-2551) Remove Hadoop Logo from ZooKeeper documentation
Arshad Mohammad created ZOOKEEPER-2551: -- Summary: Remove Hadoop Logo from ZooKeeper documentation Key: ZOOKEEPER-2551 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2551 Project: ZooKeeper Issue Type: Bug Components: documentation Reporter: Arshad Mohammad Assignee: Arshad Mohammad Fix For: 3.5.3 ZooKeeper documentation has hadoop logo on each page's header. There is no significance to put the hadoop logo on ZooKeeper project. So hadoop logo should be removed from Zookeeper as ZooKeeper is independent of hadoop project, -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
Re: Hadoop logo in docs
So in the header for each doc page? e.g. http://zookeeper.apache.org/doc/r3.4.9/zookeeperOver.html I don't see why we couldn't remove it. Perhaps for seo reasons? Patrick On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 10:47 PM, Arshad Mohammad < arshad.mohamma...@gmail.com> wrote: > The log is at only one place. > > In the code: in src\docs\src\documentation\skinconf.xml > > Hadoop > Apache Hadoop > http://hadoop.apache.org/ > images/hadoop-logo.jpg > > In generated doc > [image: Inline image 2] > > -Arshad > > On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 9:51 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote: > >> What's an example? Can you provide some links? >> >> Patrick >> >> On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 2:00 AM, Flavio Junqueira <f...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> > Is there any particular reason for having the Hadoop logo in our docs? I >> > understand that it is there for historical reasons, but is there any >> other >> > reason, could we consider removing it? >> > >> > -Flavio >> > >
Re: Hadoop logo in docs
The log is at only one place. In the code: in src\docs\src\documentation\skinconf.xml Hadoop Apache Hadoop http://hadoop.apache.org/ images/hadoop-logo.jpg In generated doc [image: Inline image 2] -Arshad On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 9:51 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote: > What's an example? Can you provide some links? > > Patrick > > On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 2:00 AM, Flavio Junqueira <f...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Is there any particular reason for having the Hadoop logo in our docs? I > > understand that it is there for historical reasons, but is there any > other > > reason, could we consider removing it? > > > > -Flavio >
Re: Hadoop logo in docs
What's an example? Can you provide some links? Patrick On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 2:00 AM, Flavio Junqueira <f...@apache.org> wrote: > Is there any particular reason for having the Hadoop logo in our docs? I > understand that it is there for historical reasons, but is there any other > reason, could we consider removing it? > > -Flavio
Hadoop logo in docs
Is there any particular reason for having the Hadoop logo in our docs? I understand that it is there for historical reasons, but is there any other reason, could we consider removing it? -Flavio