Re: [dev-context] frule

2016-02-15 Thread Hans Hagen
On 2/15/2016 6:39 PM, Alan BRASLAU wrote: On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 18:36:15 +0100 Hans Hagen wrote: basically we use rules that get replaced by graphics (a normal framed has 4 overlapping rules, the example has one continuous shape) Nice, but I still don't understand the demonstration. it's mor

Re: [dev-context] frule

2016-02-15 Thread Alan BRASLAU
On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 18:36:15 +0100 Hans Hagen wrote: > basically we use rules that get replaced by graphics (a normal framed > has 4 overlapping rules, the example has one continuous shape) Nice, but I still don't understand the demonstration. Alan -- Alan Braslau CEA DSM-IRAMIS-SPEC CNRS UM

Re: [dev-context] frule

2016-02-15 Thread Hans Hagen
On 2/15/2016 6:17 PM, Alan BRASLAU wrote: Even though it says "\dontcomplain"... ;-) I am not sure that I understand the demonstration of the second part, with the defineoverlays... basically we use rules that get replaced by graphics (a normal framed has 4 overlapping rules, the example has

Re: [dev-context] frule

2016-02-15 Thread Alan BRASLAU
Even though it says "\dontcomplain"... ;-) I am not sure that I understand the demonstration of the second part, with the defineoverlays... Alan On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 11:34:57 +0100 Hans Hagen wrote: > Hi, > > A new feature ... not sure if i need to add the defineoverlays ... > > \unprotect >

[dev-context] frule

2016-02-15 Thread Hans Hagen
Hi, A new feature ... not sure if i need to add the defineoverlays ... \unprotect \def\overlayradius{\framedparameter\c!frameradius} \protect \dontcomplain \starttext \testfeatureonce{25}{\dontleavehmode \ruledhbox\bgroup \red \frule width 2cm