Re: [dev-context] New context release

2008-04-16 Thread Norbert Preining
Hi all, On Mi, 16 Apr 2008, Taco Hoekwater wrote: http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Release_Note for everything we did change and patch in the past 24 hours. If nothing bad happens, this release will go to CTAN (and debian, I presume) sometime tomorrow. Preliminary packages are available

Re: [dev-context] New context release

2008-04-16 Thread Hans Hagen
Norbert Preining wrote: Hi all, On Mi, 16 Apr 2008, Taco Hoekwater wrote: http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Release_Note for everything we did change and patch in the past 24 hours. If nothing bad happens, this release will go to CTAN (and debian, I presume) sometime tomorrow.

Re: [dev-context] New context release

2008-04-16 Thread Hans Hagen
Norbert Preining wrote: On Mi, 16 Apr 2008, Hans Hagen wrote: indeed we need the latest although in the luatex version there is a kind of fallback name subsystem, Aehm what does this mean??? So either you need it, or there is a fallback system ... semantics are sometimes dangerous

Re: [dev-context] New context release

2008-04-16 Thread Norbert Preining
On Mi, 16 Apr 2008, Hans Hagen wrote: well, it may work with the old fonts (depends on how old), in font-syn.tex you will find Well it is the last release before the renaming of the fonts, as I said 1.01x. etc. so older fonts are ok for context/luatex; while for xetex new fonts are

Re: [dev-context] New context release

2008-04-16 Thread Norbert Preining
On Mi, 16 Apr 2008, Norbert Preining wrote: - for context/luatex: ok with old and new ones - for context/xetex: new ones are necessary Ok, I will think about updating the lmodern fonts, too, but renaming the Hmm, according to Ralf updating the lmodern is a no-go because that would need

Re: [dev-context] New context release

2008-04-16 Thread Norbert Preining
On Mi, 16 Apr 2008, Mojca Miklavec wrote: For XeLaTeX you indeed need to update fontspec, but if you're reluctant to upgrade the rest of XeTeX, a fix of fontspec to support the latest LM fonts is so minor, that it's really not worth having a broken ConTeXt+XeTeX. fontspec might need only a few

Re: [dev-context] New context release

2008-04-16 Thread Mojca Miklavec
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 1:42 AM, Jonathan Kew wrote: On 16 Apr 2008, at 7:56 pm, Norbert Preining wrote: Given that there won't be TL2008 in lenny, I think it would be very desirable to update xetex to a more recent version than 0.996 as shipped with TL2007. (I don't know much about the

Re: [dev-context] New context release

2008-04-16 Thread Norbert Preining
Hi Will, On Do, 17 Apr 2008, Will Robertson wrote: All other XeTeX+LaTeX packages are unaffected and you should use the latest versions from the SVN repository. If you need me to upload the Umpf, I don't like to package stuff that is in some svn repository for a stable release, stuff that