Am 22.08.2009 um 13:47 schrieb Oliver Buerschaper:
What's more important, the exit status of the context command is 0
(via echo $?) indicating that there was no problem at all! This
might turn out problematic as soon as documents are processed in a
batch run ... (like e.g. a regression
On Sun, 23 Aug 2009, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 22.08.2009 um 13:47 schrieb Oliver Buerschaper:
What's more important, the exit status of the context command is 0 (via
echo $?) indicating that there was no problem at all! This might turn out
problematic as soon as documents are processed
What's more important, the exit status of the context command is 0
(via echo $?) indicating that there was no problem at all! This
might turn out problematic as soon as documents are processed in a
batch run ... (like e.g. a regression test suite ;-)
*You* want to write a test suite for
Am 23.08.2009 um 17:22 schrieb Aditya Mahajan:
*You* want to write a test suite for ConTeXt?
The test suite is there. There is even a script in the test suit
that compares the outputs of two versions at pixel level. All we
need is people to submit tests and then someone to monitor the
Am 23.08.2009 um 17:52 schrieb Oliver Buerschaper:
I agree that my suggestion would sacrifice backwards compatibility.
At the same time I'm not sure how much change to the MkIV kernel is
desirable given that MkII is considered frozen. I'm really in no
position to have an educated opinion
On Sun, 23 Aug 2009, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 23.08.2009 um 17:52 schrieb Oliver Buerschaper:
I agree that my suggestion would sacrifice backwards compatibility. At the
same time I'm not sure how much change to the MkIV kernel is desirable
given that MkII is considered frozen. I'm really
