[dev-context] beta

2011-12-21 Thread Hans Hagen
Hi Wolfgang et al, I cleaned up mkiv'd pack-rul, meta-ini, anch-pgr etc and for sure there have been bugs introduced. A couple of mkii artefacts have been removed and some speedups were possible (important as framed is a core macro so especially backgrounds have been redone a bit). I still

Re: [dev-context] beta

2011-12-21 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Am 21.12.2011 um 23:26 schrieb Hans Hagen: Hi Wolfgang et al, I cleaned up mkiv'd pack-rul, meta-ini, anch-pgr etc and for sure there have been bugs introduced. A couple of mkii artefacts have been removed and some speedups were possible (important as framed is a core macro so especially

[dev-context] type-mar.mkvi

2011-12-21 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Hi Hans, the \margindata commands still used the no longer available \dosetupstrut command. Wolfgang ___ dev-context mailing list dev-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/dev-context

Re: [dev-context] beta

2011-12-21 Thread Aditya Mahajan
On Thu, 22 Dec 2011, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: PS. I hope that in 2012 I've redone all the code (consistency, mkiv'd, namespaces, etc). Can we now consider the following prefixes for registers as the suggested method to name them: \newcount: \c_… \newdimen: \d_… \newskip: \s_… \newbox: \b_…

Re: [dev-context] beta

2011-12-21 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Am 22.12.2011 um 01:19 schrieb Aditya Mahajan: On Thu, 22 Dec 2011, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: PS. I hope that in 2012 I've redone all the code (consistency, mkiv'd, namespaces, etc). Can we now consider the following prefixes for registers as the suggested method to name them:

Re: [dev-context] beta

2011-12-21 Thread Aditya Mahajan
On Thu, 22 Dec 2011, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: Am 22.12.2011 um 01:19 schrieb Aditya Mahajan: On Thu, 22 Dec 2011, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: PS. I hope that in 2012 I've redone all the code (consistency, mkiv'd, namespaces, etc). Can we now consider the following prefixes for registers as