On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 8:05 PM, Matt Brubeck mbrub...@mozilla.com wrote:
PROPOSAL:
* We should add Tablet to the User-Agent header when the the Metro Firefox
UI is used *and* the hardware supports touch input.
* For non-touch hardware, we should make no changes to the User-Agent
header.
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 8:37 PM, Jeff Walden jwalden+...@mit.edu wrote:
We ended up removing the nested |using| above and making all SpiderMonkey
headers qualify everything with mozilla::. We use few enough things from
mozilla:: so far that we switched to |using mozilla::RangedPtr| and so on
Henri Sivonen wrote:
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 7:38 PM, Neil n...@parkwaycc.co.uk wrote:
Is there any way we can make it so that the prefixed version doesn't work
unless you attempt (and presumably fail) to detect the unprefixed version?
What purpose would the prefix serve in such a
Robert O'Callahan wrote:
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 8:37 PM, Jeff Walden jwalden+...@mit.edu wrote:
We ended up removing the nested |using| above and making all SpiderMonkey
headers qualify everything with mozilla::. We use few enough things from
mozilla:: so far that we switched to |using
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Neil n...@parkwaycc.co.uk wrote:
Henri Sivonen wrote:
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 7:38 PM, Neil n...@parkwaycc.co.uk wrote:
Is there any way we can make it so that the prefixed version doesn't work
unless you attempt (and presumably fail) to detect the unprefixed
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 7:51 AM, Gervase Markham g...@mozilla.org wrote:
D) Use neither, like Chrome. UA sniffing is evil. Developers should use the
presence of a touch API to detect touch capability, and use flexible layout
to adapt to whatever screen size the user has. This is Google's
On Tuesday, November 13, 2012 4:49:14 AM UTC-6, Jonas Sicking wrote:
Note that API detection is only possible client-side. (And using
javascript, though this is less of an issue).
Websites generally send dramatically different content for touch-based
UIs. Different enough that they'd want to
jim.math...@gmail.com wrote:
Key notes -
* The 8.0 SDK requires Windows 7 (or Windows Server 2008 R2)
--
Warning: May contain traces of nuts.
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 9:59 AM, Randell Jesup rjesup.n...@jesup.org wrote:
The WebRTC API (and MediaStream API via the Media Capture Task Force and
getUserMedia()) is very much still in flux.
I’m not familiar with these specs, so I don’t know why they are still in flux.
Chrome is shipping
On 12.11.2012 19:05, Matt Brubeck wrote:
* Sites that follow our existing guidelines to send tablet-optimized
content to Firefox for Android tablets will not need any changes, and
will immediately begin serving tablet-optimized content to Firefox for
Metro.
Is there a significant amount of
On 13.11.2012 00:47, Alex Keybl wrote:
almost nobody uses Mozilla Firefox builds(and no Firefox disributors do pgo)
We should really get the latter fixed. Disabling PGO for our builds
seems like a step in the wrong direction; the numbers collected in this
thread suggest that it's a major
On 2012-11-13 9:56 AM, Jonathan Kew wrote:
On 12/11/12 15:47, Alex Keybl wrote:
Bug 799295 [1], the driver for this thread, is still an open issue for
FF18 (shipping in 6 weeks). The JS team's recommendation remains to
disable PGO on Linux. According to Taras, the major benefits of PGO on
Linux
Hi,
what is the recommend way to import JavaScript code modules in files
part of Gecko?
1) Don't add the import line
Components.utils.import(resource://app/my_module.jsm); into the file
if the module has already been loaded by a different JavaScript file
load earlier.
Advantage: Fastest
This week's MemShrink meeting will be brought to you by infallible allocation
from Gecko Layout arenas:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=809533
Note:
* New meeting time (2:00pm PST)
* New meeting room (today only)
The wiki page for this meeting is at:
Henri Sivonen hsivo...@iki.fi writes:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 9:59 AM, Randell Jesup rjesup.n...@jesup.org wrote:
The WebRTC API (and MediaStream API via the Media Capture Task Force and
getUserMedia()) is very much still in flux.
I’m not familiar with these specs, so I don’t know why they
On 13.11.2012 12:24, jim.math...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, November 13, 2012 4:49:14 AM UTC-6, Jonas Sicking wrote:
Note that putting touch in the UA is somewhat different than
traditional UA sniffing. It's actually capability testing which is
what we are encouraging people to do. Using
On 11/13/12 10:27 AM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
Agreed. Actually, reading the bug closely, there's nothing which says
someone has tried to debug this (it's not even clear if it's
reproducible locally), and it seems like the only evidence that we have
about this being PGO related is that it happens
If the Snappy initiative (or any other group of Mozillians) has short-term
plans to evangelize the perf wins of PGO to Linux distros, I agree that we
should leave PGO builds and testing enabled on Linux and further investigate
the mysterious crash in bug 799295. Otherwise, our builds/testing
On 11/13/2012 3:53 PM, Alex Keybl wrote:
If the Snappy initiative (or any other group of Mozillians) has short-term
plans to evangelize the perf wins of PGO to Linux distros, I agree that we
should leave PGO builds and testing enabled on Linux and further investigate
the mysterious crash in
19 matches
Mail list logo
