Re: "abort" listener not executed for XHR

On Nov 23, 5:36 am, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > On 11/22/12 3:48 AM, Jan Honza Odvarko wrote: > > > I can create a simple extension, but it'll require having patch from > > bug 800799 applied. > > That's fine.  I'm pretty good at applying patches.  ;) Excellent ;-) > > Should I create a new bug report

Re: Firefox Social API

It seems this bug tracks the work for integration with any chat provider/site: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=809694 Cheers, David - Original Message - From: "David Dahl" To: "Adam Sobieski" Cc: dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2012 11:35:07 PM

Re: Firefox Social API

Adam: Disclaimer: I only speak for myself, not Mozilla, I do not have a Facebook account (and have no plans to create one even to test this Firefox feature) The Social API was built to be quite generic in nature. I assume it is pretty easily-integrated with any site that desires to do so. I ima

Re: "abort" listener not executed for XHR

On 11/22/12 3:48 AM, Jan Honza Odvarko wrote: I can create a simple extension, but it'll require having patch from bug 800799 applied. That's fine. I'm pretty good at applying patches. ;) Should I create a new bug report for this? Please! -Boris _

Re: Firefox Social API

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 22/11/12 03:29 PM, Adam Sobieski wrote: > We can envision and develop features for P2P video communication > systems We can. It would also be great if we built some of them too! Have you looked at https://github.com/anantn/socialapi-demo ? It's a

Firefox Social API

Mozilla Firefox Team and Community, Greetings. I would like to comment on the new Firefox Social API (http://blog.mozilla.org/blog/2012/11/20/firefox-introduces-new-social-api-and-previews-integration-with-facebook/). I would like to list a few events that might indicate some concerns that a

Re: Linux 64bit Firefox

On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Quentin Headen < qhea...@phaseshiftsoftware.com> wrote: > I read the thread in dev.planning about the win64 builders being turned > off. So win64 Firefox isn't being maintained. I just wanted to know if the > Linux versions are being maintained, or are they also p

Linux 64bit Firefox

I read the thread in dev.planning about the win64 builders being turned off. So win64 Firefox isn't being maintained. I just wanted to know if the Linux versions are being maintained, or are they also placed in the background like the Windows version? ___

Re: Farcebook.messenger

Hi Till, I think you may be confused by the way a lot of tech news sites have announced it. "Much like the OpenSearch standard, Mozilla’s new Social APIlets social services integrate into Firefox in a compelling way and makes it easier to use the Web

Re: Are there plans for a chrome js debugger?

It's partially usable. I think the biggest issue right now is bug 808588 - "Cannot debug script files included in a xul file" (and possibly scripts loaded via loadSubScript). We need to figure out why this is preventing some classes of script from hitting breakpoints in chrome. Debugging JSMs t

Farcebook.messenger

You just lost me as a Loyal user and promoter of Firefox for over ten years! Bye! ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

how to put a button into the title bar in xulrunner?

Hi, all: I am using xulrunner 16 to develop my project. I want to put a button into the title bar of the window. I have set the drawintitlebar attribute of the window to be true, and my xul code is there: ... I want to let the button appear in the title bar of the main window, but

Re: "abort" listener not executed for XHR

On Nov 21, 5:53 pm, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > On 11/21/12 11:31 AM, Jan Honza Odvarko wrote: > > > Am I doing something wrong? > > When is the addEventListener call made? There are two scenarios: 1) The listener is appended when "http-on-modify-request" is sent. It works in 17, but broken now becaus