On Sun 22 Sep 2013 11:10:15 PM PDT, Gregory Szorc wrote:
> On 9/22/2013 10:05 PM, Mark Hammond wrote:
>> On 23/09/2013 2:46 PM, Gregory Szorc wrote:
>>> On Sep 22, 2013, at 18:20, Mark Hammond
>>> wrote:
>>>
On 23/09/2013 11:04 AM, Gregory Szorc wrote:
> On Sep 22, 2013, at 16:35, Anthony
On 9/22/2013 10:05 PM, Mark Hammond wrote:
> On 23/09/2013 2:46 PM, Gregory Szorc wrote:
>> On Sep 22, 2013, at 18:20, Mark Hammond
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 23/09/2013 11:04 AM, Gregory Szorc wrote:
On Sep 22, 2013, at 16:35, Anthony Jones
wrote:
> On 21/09/13 17:58, Robert O'Callah
On 23/09/13 16:49, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
> I see how compiling several files in the same cl invocation would mess
> up using /showincludes to track dependencies, making this difficult to
> fix. The only possibility I can think of for fixing this is to emit a
> Visual Studio project and make the
On 23/09/2013 2:46 PM, Gregory Szorc wrote:
On Sep 22, 2013, at 18:20, Mark Hammond
wrote:
On 23/09/2013 11:04 AM, Gregory Szorc wrote:
On Sep 22, 2013, at 16:35, Anthony Jones
wrote:
On 21/09/13 17:58, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
I don't think that's necessarily true on Windows. If we can
f
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Gregory Szorc wrote:
> On Sep 22, 2013, at 16:35, Anthony Jones wrote:
>
> > On 21/09/13 17:58, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
> >> I don't think that's necessarily true on Windows. If we can find a way
> to
> >> generate Visual Studio projects and use those to build,
On Sep 22, 2013, at 18:20, Mark Hammond wrote:
> On 23/09/2013 11:04 AM, Gregory Szorc wrote:
>> On Sep 22, 2013, at 16:35, Anthony Jones wrote:
>>
>>> On 21/09/13 17:58, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
I don't think that's necessarily true on Windows. If we can find a way to
generate Visual
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 6:20 PM, Mark Hammond wrote:
> [I also see a clobber build spend > 5 minutes in various configure runs,
> which frustrates me every time I see it - so I minimize the shell ;]
>
Yep, and the amazing thing is that we basically don't even need to run most
of that junk on Wind
On 23/09/2013 11:04 AM, Gregory Szorc wrote:
On Sep 22, 2013, at 16:35, Anthony Jones wrote:
On 21/09/13 17:58, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
I don't think that's necessarily true on Windows. If we can find a way to
generate Visual Studio projects and use those to build, or do most of the
build, w
On Sep 22, 2013, at 16:35, Anthony Jones wrote:
> On 21/09/13 17:58, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
>> I don't think that's necessarily true on Windows. If we can find a way to
>> generate Visual Studio projects and use those to build, or do most of the
>> build, we can probably go a lot faster than us
On 21/09/13 17:58, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
> I don't think that's necessarily true on Windows. If we can find a way to
> generate Visual Studio projects and use those to build, or do most of the
> build, we can probably go a lot faster than using cl command-line
> invocations compiling one file pe
10 matches
Mail list logo