Re: You want faster builds, don't you?

2013-09-22 Thread Steve Fink
On Sun 22 Sep 2013 11:10:15 PM PDT, Gregory Szorc wrote: > On 9/22/2013 10:05 PM, Mark Hammond wrote: >> On 23/09/2013 2:46 PM, Gregory Szorc wrote: >>> On Sep 22, 2013, at 18:20, Mark Hammond >>> wrote: >>> On 23/09/2013 11:04 AM, Gregory Szorc wrote: > On Sep 22, 2013, at 16:35, Anthony

Re: You want faster builds, don't you?

2013-09-22 Thread Gregory Szorc
On 9/22/2013 10:05 PM, Mark Hammond wrote: > On 23/09/2013 2:46 PM, Gregory Szorc wrote: >> On Sep 22, 2013, at 18:20, Mark Hammond >> wrote: >> >>> On 23/09/2013 11:04 AM, Gregory Szorc wrote: On Sep 22, 2013, at 16:35, Anthony Jones wrote: > On 21/09/13 17:58, Robert O'Callah

Re: You want faster builds, don't you?

2013-09-22 Thread Anthony Jones
On 23/09/13 16:49, Robert O'Callahan wrote: > I see how compiling several files in the same cl invocation would mess > up using /showincludes to track dependencies, making this difficult to > fix. The only possibility I can think of for fixing this is to emit a > Visual Studio project and make the

Re: You want faster builds, don't you?

2013-09-22 Thread Mark Hammond
On 23/09/2013 2:46 PM, Gregory Szorc wrote: On Sep 22, 2013, at 18:20, Mark Hammond wrote: On 23/09/2013 11:04 AM, Gregory Szorc wrote: On Sep 22, 2013, at 16:35, Anthony Jones wrote: On 21/09/13 17:58, Robert O'Callahan wrote: I don't think that's necessarily true on Windows. If we can f

Re: You want faster builds, don't you?

2013-09-22 Thread Robert O'Callahan
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Gregory Szorc wrote: > On Sep 22, 2013, at 16:35, Anthony Jones wrote: > > > On 21/09/13 17:58, Robert O'Callahan wrote: > >> I don't think that's necessarily true on Windows. If we can find a way > to > >> generate Visual Studio projects and use those to build,

Re: You want faster builds, don't you?

2013-09-22 Thread Gregory Szorc
On Sep 22, 2013, at 18:20, Mark Hammond wrote: > On 23/09/2013 11:04 AM, Gregory Szorc wrote: >> On Sep 22, 2013, at 16:35, Anthony Jones wrote: >> >>> On 21/09/13 17:58, Robert O'Callahan wrote: I don't think that's necessarily true on Windows. If we can find a way to generate Visual

Re: You want faster builds, don't you?

2013-09-22 Thread Brian Smith
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 6:20 PM, Mark Hammond wrote: > [I also see a clobber build spend > 5 minutes in various configure runs, > which frustrates me every time I see it - so I minimize the shell ;] > Yep, and the amazing thing is that we basically don't even need to run most of that junk on Wind

Re: You want faster builds, don't you?

2013-09-22 Thread Mark Hammond
On 23/09/2013 11:04 AM, Gregory Szorc wrote: On Sep 22, 2013, at 16:35, Anthony Jones wrote: On 21/09/13 17:58, Robert O'Callahan wrote: I don't think that's necessarily true on Windows. If we can find a way to generate Visual Studio projects and use those to build, or do most of the build, w

Re: You want faster builds, don't you?

2013-09-22 Thread Gregory Szorc
On Sep 22, 2013, at 16:35, Anthony Jones wrote: > On 21/09/13 17:58, Robert O'Callahan wrote: >> I don't think that's necessarily true on Windows. If we can find a way to >> generate Visual Studio projects and use those to build, or do most of the >> build, we can probably go a lot faster than us

Re: You want faster builds, don't you?

2013-09-22 Thread Anthony Jones
On 21/09/13 17:58, Robert O'Callahan wrote: > I don't think that's necessarily true on Windows. If we can find a way to > generate Visual Studio projects and use those to build, or do most of the > build, we can probably go a lot faster than using cl command-line > invocations compiling one file pe