Our (ostensibly) weekly DOM bindings meetings continue on Monday March
3rd at 12:30 PM PST.
Meeting details:
* Monday, March 3, 2014, 12:30 PM PST (3:30 PM EST/9:30 PM CET)
* Dial-in Info:
- Vidyo room: Boris Zbarsky
- In office or soft phone: extension 92
- US/INTL: 650-903-0800 or
URLs in stack traces for exception objects have been recently changed. There is
a column number appended at the end (I am seeing this in Nightly, but it could
be also in Aurora).
An example of the stack trace:
http://example.com/path/file.html:102
... means there was an exception at the
On 3/3/14 1:54 PM, Jan Honza Odvarko wrote:
An example of the stack trace:
http://example.com/path/file.html:102
Which exact API is this string coming from? We have a number of
different APIs here, returning slightly different things. :(
-Boris
I'm guessing this is a result of
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=762556
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
On 3/3/14 1:54 PM, Jan Honza Odvarko wrote:
An example of the stack trace:
http://example.com/path/file.html:102
Which exact API is
Hi everyone, I'm working on a feature to offer webpage translation in
Firefox. Translation involves, quite unsurprisingly, a lot of DOM and
strings manipulation. Since DOM access only happens in the main thread, it
brings the question of how to do it properly without causing jank.
This is the use
On Mar 3, 2014, at 2:28 PM, Felipe G fel...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everyone, I'm working on a feature to offer webpage translation in
Firefox. Translation involves, quite unsurprisingly, a lot of DOM and
strings manipulation. Since DOM access only happens in the main thread, it
brings the
On Friday Chad posted and blogged about our proposed plugin whitelisting
policy.
https://wiki.mozilla.org/Plugins/Firefox_Whitelist
https://blog.mozilla.org/security/2014/02/28/update-on-plugin-activation/
The primary goal of this policy is to give plugin vendors who are
working on moving
On 3/3/14 2:28 PM, Felipe G wrote:
A possible solution to that is to only pause the page that is being translated
(with,
say, EnterModalState) until we can finish working on it, while letting
other pages and the UI work normally.
The other pages can still modify the DOM of the page in
During the translation phase, Chrome imports a JS script into the webpage
and this script does all the translation work.
There's the language detection phase (another use case that I plan to ask
on a separate e-mail) in which chrome does a .textContent and run the
language detection off of it on
On 2014-03-03, 3:30 PM, Felipe G wrote:
During the translation phase, Chrome imports a JS script into the webpage
and this script does all the translation work.
There's the language detection phase (another use case that I plan to ask
on a separate e-mail) in which chrome does a .textContent
On 2014-03-03, 3:19 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
Better yet if we can send this copy with a non-copy move to a Worker
thread.
You could send the string to a worker (if you do this in C++ you won't
even need to copy it, afaict), but then on the worker you have to parse
the HTML... That said, there
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 5:19 PM, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
On 3/3/14 2:28 PM, Felipe G wrote:
A possible solution to that is to only pause the page that is being
translated (with,
say, EnterModalState) until we can finish working on it, while letting
other pages and the UI work
The next MemShrink meeting will be brought to you by images decoded *and*
downsampled at the same time:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=854795
The wiki page for this meeting is at:
https://wiki.mozilla.org/Performance/MemShrink
Agenda:
* Prioritize unprioritized MemShrink bugs.
Hi,
translating DOM is a bit funky. Generally, you can probably translate
block elements one by one, but you need to persist inline elements.
You should mark up the inline elements in the string that you send to
the translation engine, such that you can support inline markup changing
the
Jan Honza Odvarko wrote:
Next example:
http://example.com:80
Now it isn't clear whether it's a port number or a line number.
Could we somehow fix this?
http://example.com/; is equivalent to http://example.com; so you could
just ensure that you output a / when the path is empty.
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 9:19 AM, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
How feasible is just doing .innerHTML to do that, then doing some sort of
async parse (e.g. XHR or DOMParser) to get a DOM snapshot? That said, this
would mean that you end up with a snapshot that's actual DOM stuff, on the
On 3/3/14 9:07 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
document.documentElement.cloneNode(true): ~18ms
document.cloneNode(true): ~8ms
Oh, and the difference between these two is that in the former clones of
img elements try to do image loads, which takes about 70% of the
cloning time, but in the
On Sunday, March 2, 2014 10:58:28 AM UTC-8, Asa Dotzler wrote:
How much simpler could our style code be if we followed this path? What
do the standards and other browser vendors say about this? Horrible
idea? Great idea? Mixed?
This is in preparation for simplifying the Blink style
On 3/2/14, 1:46 PM, Axel Hecht wrote:
Hi,
I've watched you guys thinking for an hour ;-)
Some comments from me.
Yes to moving build flows that generate assets into the tree.
Yes to having a way for developers to reproduce what automation does.
Yes to having jobs being executed more on demand
Android also ships a parser that we wrote for Reader mode:
http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/mobile/android/chrome/content/JSDOMParser.js
We've talked about extending it to also do phone number/address detection as
well, but haven't tried (reader mode doesn't need to modify the
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 8:09 PM, L. David Baron dba...@dbaron.org wrote:
In other words, whenever you have a pointer in a static data
structure pointing to some other data, that pointer needs to get
fixed up when the library loads, which makes the memory that pointer
is in less likely to be
21 matches
Mail list logo
