On Tuesday, April 1, 2014 5:56:53 PM UTC+5:30, Jonathan Kew wrote:
Hi,
We have a property in greprefs.js layout.css.dpi by which we can
control pixel size , but this doesn't work in Windows. There is
another property layout.css.devPixelsPerPx which control font size
in
Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
On 2014-04-01, 8:10 PM, Martin Thomson wrote:
count_type tmp = --mRefCnt;
if (tmp == 0) {
delete this;
}
And how do we enforce people to write code like the above example
using the current Atomic interface?
Would WARN_UNUSED_RESULT help here, so that you remember
On 04/01/2014 02:32 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
The summary is that I think the mozilla::Atomic API which is modeled after
std::atomic is harmful in that it makes it very non-obvious that you're
dealing with atomic integers. Basically the existing interface makes
mozilla::Atomic look like a normal
The Web API documentation meeting is Friday at 9 AM Pacific Time.
Everyone's welcome to attend; if you're interested in ensuring that
these APIs are properly documented, we'd love your input.
We have an agenda, as well as details on how to join, here:
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 5:56 PM, Zack Weinberg za...@panix.com wrote:
The downside of turning this on would be that any switch statements
that *deliberately* include only a subset of the enumerators, plus a
default case, would now have to be expanded to cover all the
enumerators.
If there are
On 4/2/2014 11:33 AM, Nicolas B. Pierron wrote:
--lock(mRefCnt);
if (lock(mRefCnt) == 0) {
delete this;
}
This way, this is more obvious that we might not be doing the right
things, as long as we are careful to refuse AtomicHandler references
in reviews.
I personally don't think this
On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 05:03:53PM +0200, Honza Bambas wrote:
On 4/2/2014 11:33 AM, Nicolas B. Pierron wrote:
--lock(mRefCnt);
if (lock(mRefCnt) == 0) {
delete this;
}
This way, this is more obvious that we might not be doing the right
things, as long as we are careful to refuse
On 4/2/2014 5:24 PM, Trevor Saunders wrote:
On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 05:03:53PM +0200, Honza Bambas wrote:
On 4/2/2014 11:33 AM, Nicolas B. Pierron wrote:
--lock(mRefCnt);
if (lock(mRefCnt) == 0) {
delete this;
}
This way, this is more obvious that we might not be doing the right
things, as
On 2014-04-02, 1:46 AM, Paul wrote:
I strongly suspect this happens due to the permission issue while Nightly does
not allow me to gain root privileges.
However, this is necessary for me to complete my experiment. How can I obtain a
decent permission while I do this?
strace -f should see
On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 05:37:39PM +0200, Honza Bambas wrote:
On 4/2/2014 5:24 PM, Trevor Saunders wrote:
On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 05:03:53PM +0200, Honza Bambas wrote:
On 4/2/2014 11:33 AM, Nicolas B. Pierron wrote:
--lock(mRefCnt);
if (lock(mRefCnt) == 0) {
delete this;
}
This way,
On 2014-04-02, 12:11 AM, Joshua Cranmer wrote:
On 4/1/2014 4:32 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
So, over in bug 987887 I'm proposing to remove all of the methods on
mozilla::Atomic except for copy construction and assignment and replace
them with global functions that can operate on the atomic type.
On 2014-04-02, 11:03 AM, Honza Bambas wrote:
On 4/2/2014 11:33 AM, Nicolas B. Pierron wrote:
--lock(mRefCnt);
if (lock(mRefCnt) == 0) {
delete this;
}
This way, this is more obvious that we might not be doing the right
things, as long as we are careful to refuse AtomicHandler references
in
On 2014-04-02, 4:43 AM, Neil wrote:
Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
On 2014-04-01, 8:10 PM, Martin Thomson wrote:
count_type tmp = --mRefCnt;
if (tmp == 0) {
delete this;
}
And how do we enforce people to write code like the above example
using the current Atomic interface?
Would
On 4/2/2014 3:52 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
On 2014-04-02, 12:11 AM, Joshua Cranmer wrote:
On 4/1/2014 4:32 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
So, over in bug 987887 I'm proposing to remove all of the methods on
mozilla::Atomic except for copy construction and assignment and replace
them with global
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Joshua Cranmer pidgeo...@gmail.comwrote:
On 4/2/2014 3:52 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
On 2014-04-02, 12:11 AM, Joshua Cranmer wrote:
On 4/1/2014 4:32 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
So, over in bug 987887 I'm proposing to remove all of the methods on
On 2014-04-02, at 14:01, Ehsan Akhgari ehsan.akhg...@gmail.com wrote:
AtomicFetchAndSub(mRefCnt, -1);
I think that I’ll join those who seem to favour member functions over statics,
as you seem to prefer for some reason.
If you want to avoid inventing names and such, how about copying from
2014-04-02 11:03 GMT-04:00 Honza Bambas honzab@firemni.cz:
On 4/2/2014 11:33 AM, Nicolas B. Pierron wrote:
--lock(mRefCnt);
if (lock(mRefCnt) == 0) {
delete this;
}
This way, this is more obvious that we might not be doing the right
things, as long as we are careful to refuse
On 4/2/2014 5:30 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
I have no reservations against making them member functions with a
clear name that do not return T/T*/etc. I was trying to not be super
inconsistent with std::atomic, but if you think that's ok, that's fine
by me.
std::atomic has the fetch_* methods
I'm trying to use a gamepad in Firefox on Ubuntu 13.10. It shows up fine
in lsusb and jstest, but neither Firefox nor Chromium seem to see it. It
seems like I'm missing a crucial package or something. Any ideas?
My code works fine if I forward the USB device to a VM, but I don't want
to have
Using a Mozilla build or the Ubuntu package?
http://nightly.mozilla.org/
or
http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/all/
Kevin
On Apr 2, 2014 6:15 PM, Geoff Lankow ge...@darktrojan.net wrote:
I'm trying to use a gamepad in Firefox on Ubuntu 13.10. It shows up fine
in lsusb and jstest, but
I've tried both, and also Firefox built on this machine.
On 03/04/14 15:16, Kevin Brosnan wrote:
Using a Mozilla build or the Ubuntu package?
http://nightly.mozilla.org/
or
http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/all/
Kevin
On Apr 2, 2014 6:15 PM, Geoff Lankow ge...@darktrojan.net wrote:
I'm
21 matches
Mail list logo
