Re: Time to revive the require SSE2 discussion

2014-05-11 Thread Robert Kaiser
When you want to whole stability group to get a message, please send to stability@m.o ;-) That said, IMHO, the API, esp. the SuperSearch part of it, should be just as good or even better than the CSV stuff you're doing, as you should be able to more directly get a lot of what you need out of

PSA: nsTArray lengths and indices are now size_t (were uint32_t)

2014-05-11 Thread Benoit Jacob
Hi, Since Bug 1004098 landed, the type of nsTArray lengths and indices is now size_t. Code using nsTArrays is encouraged to use size_t for indexing them; in most cases, this does not really matter; however there is one case where this does matter, which is when user code stores the result of

nsRefPtr vs RefPtr

2014-05-11 Thread Chris Pearce
We have two reference counted smart pointer implementations; nsRefPtr and the newer mozilla::RefPtr. Should we be preferring mozilla::RefPtr in new code? Should we be replacing nsRefPtr with mozilla::RefPtr? Cheers, Chris P. ___ dev-platform

Re: nsRefPtr vs RefPtr

2014-05-11 Thread Boris Zbarsky
On 5/11/14, 7:50 PM, Chris Pearce wrote: Should we be preferring mozilla::RefPtr in new code? Should we be replacing nsRefPtr with mozilla::RefPtr? I would err on no for both, given https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=820257 -Boris ___