Re: How to use jquery in xul files of thunderbird

2014-07-16 Thread David Rajchenbach-Teller
Hi, Generally, using jQuery in XUL files is not supported. Some of jQuery might work accidentally, but it is designed specifically to work with HTML, not XUL. If you want to write HTML-based add-ons, you should take a look at Jetpack. Cheers, David On 16/07/14 05:38, 王欢 wrote: Dear,

Re: Studying Lossy Image Compression Efficiency, July 2014

2014-07-16 Thread renesd
Cool =Re decoding. I'm replying to this note: 1. We're fans of libjpeg-turbo - it powers JPEG decoding in Firefox because its focus is on being fast, and that isn't going to change any time soon. The mozjpeg project focuses solely on encoding, and we trade some CPU cycles for smaller

Re: How to use jquery in xul files of thunderbird

2014-07-16 Thread Jorge Villalobos
On 7/16/14, 2:40 AM, David Rajchenbach-Teller wrote: Hi, Generally, using jQuery in XUL files is not supported. Some of jQuery might work accidentally, but it is designed specifically to work with HTML, not XUL. If you want to write HTML-based add-ons, you should take a look at

Re: Intent to implement: webserial api

2014-07-16 Thread Dave Hylands
Legacy RS232 ports on PC motherboards are probably not that important. But phones, and devices like the Raspberry Pi, and BeagleBone Black, also have native serial ports (i.e. non-USB, non-Bluetooth), and the people that use these types of devices are the very one which are extremely

Re: Intent to implement: webserial api

2014-07-16 Thread Andrew Sutherland
On 07/16/2014 02:03 PM, Dave Hylands wrote: But phones, and devices like the Raspberry Pi, and BeagleBone Black, also have native serial ports (i.e. non-USB, non-Bluetooth), and the people that use these types of devices are the very one which are extremely frustrated by the lack of support

Intent to deploy: plugin timeout A/B test experiment, bug 1018200

2014-07-16 Thread Benjamin Smedberg
This is an official notice of intent to deploy the experiment in bug 1018200 to the beta channel. The experiment is an A/B test to determine the optimal value of the dom.ipc.plugins.unloadTimeoutSecs on the FF32 beta. This setting determines primarily how long we wait to unload Flash and

Re: PSA: DebugOnly fields aren't zero-sized in non-DEBUG builds

2014-07-16 Thread Ehsan Akhgari
Should we make DebugOnly MOZ_STACK_CLASS? On 2014-07-15, 9:21 PM, Nicholas Nethercote wrote: Hi, The comment at the top of mfbt/DebugOnly.h includes this text: * Note that DebugOnly instances still take up one byte of space, plus padding, * when used as members of structs. I'm in the

Re: PSA: DebugOnly fields aren't zero-sized in non-DEBUG builds

2014-07-16 Thread Benoit Jacob
That sounds like a good idea, if possible. 2014-07-16 14:41 GMT-04:00 Ehsan Akhgari ehsan.akhg...@gmail.com: Should we make DebugOnly MOZ_STACK_CLASS? On 2014-07-15, 9:21 PM, Nicholas Nethercote wrote: Hi, The comment at the top of mfbt/DebugOnly.h includes this text: * Note that

Re: Intent to deploy: plugin timeout A/B test experiment, bug 1018200

2014-07-16 Thread Jet Villegas
after a user isn't using it any more How good are we at determining any more? Flash is used in all sorts of crazy ways, and guessing wrong can be more harmful than unloading too soon/late. --Jet ___ dev-platform mailing list

Re: Intent to deploy: plugin timeout A/B test experiment, bug 1018200

2014-07-16 Thread Benjamin Smedberg
On 7/16/2014 3:35 PM, Jet Villegas wrote: after a user isn't using it any more How good are we at determining any more? We start counting when the last instance for that plugin is destroyed (NPP_Destroy). --BDS ___ dev-platform mailing list

Re: Intent to implement: webserial api

2014-07-16 Thread Dave Hylands
I guess my point is that it isn't always possible to determine what device is connected. You need to know the correct baud rate, hardware-flow-control, serial comms to even talk to the device. Some devices are write-only. Some devices are read-only. Some devices aren't even serial devices at

Re: Intent to implement: webserial api

2014-07-16 Thread Jonas Sicking
On Jul 16, 2014 10:34 PM, Dave Hylands dhyla...@mozilla.com wrote: I guess my point is that it isn't always possible to determine what device is connected. You need to know the correct baud rate, hardware-flow-control, serial comms to even talk to the device. Some devices are write-only. Some

Intent to implement: Fetch specification

2014-07-16 Thread nsm . nikhil
Hello, Summary: The Fetch specification unifies fetching across the web platform. The intention of Bug 1039846 is to implement the content facing aspects of the Fetch specification, namely: - Request/Response/Headers/FetchBodyStream objects - Expose the fetch() method on windows and workers.

Intent to implement: navigator.deviceStorage

2014-07-16 Thread Dave Hylands
Currently, we have navigator.getDeviceStorage and navigator.getDeviceStorages We're looking to expand device storage to add support for more virtual storage areas, like DropBox, or GoogleDrive, etc. See bug 1035053 I was going to propose that we add navigator.deviceStorage (or possibly