Re: Intent to ship: MouseEvent.offsetX/Y

2015-02-27 Thread Robert O'Callahan
On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 8:30 AM, Jeff Muizelaar jmuizel...@mozilla.com wrote: On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.org wrote: Oh, another issue is that I've followed the spec and made offsetX/Y doubles, whereas Blink is integers, which introduces a small

Re: 32-bit Windows builds will fail.

2015-02-27 Thread Ben Hearsum
On 2015-02-26 05:57 PM, Mike Hoye wrote: Instead, I propose that we stand up a variety of old, slow, minimum-spec approved development boxes, build on them daily. If forward progress means we need to abandon a category of developers' machines, I ask that we try to do that with as much

Re: 32-bit Windows builds will fail.

2015-02-27 Thread Mike Hoye
On 2015-02-27 8:46 AM, Ben Hearsum wrote: On 2015-02-26 05:57 PM, Mike Hoye wrote: Instead, I propose that we stand up a variety of old, slow, minimum-spec approved development boxes, build on them daily. If forward progress means we need to abandon a category of developers' machines, I ask

Re: Intent to ship: MouseEvent.offsetX/Y

2015-02-27 Thread Robert O'Callahan
On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 8:15 AM, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.org wrote: Summary: CSSOM Views specify offsetX/Y properties on MouseEvent. Other browsers implement them. Many sites use it with a fallback for Firefox, but I've found at least one site that doesn't have a fallback. It's

Re: Intent to ship: MouseEvent.offsetX/Y

2015-02-27 Thread Jeff Muizelaar
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.org wrote: Oh, another issue is that I've followed the spec and made offsetX/Y doubles, whereas Blink is integers, which introduces a small amount compat risk. IE also uses integers. Wouldn't it be better to change the spec

Intent to ship: MouseEvent.offsetX/Y

2015-02-27 Thread Robert O'Callahan
Summary: CSSOM Views specify offsetX/Y properties on MouseEvent. Other browsers implement them. Many sites use it with a fallback for Firefox, but I've found at least one site that doesn't have a fallback. It's trivial to implement. Bug: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69787 Spec:

Intent to and unship: SSLv3

2015-02-27 Thread Masatoshi Kimura
Summary: SSLv3 is an outdated and known broken security protocol. I'll remove the support from Gecko completely. Bug: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1106470 Spec: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tls-sslv3-diediedie-00 Platform coverage: All Target release: Gecko 39. Chrome