Re: Intent to implement and ship: document.origin

2015-03-19 Thread Jonas Sicking
I think it would be weird if the invariants that hold for a and new URL() don't hold for Location. That's already the case for tons of invariants. I don't think so. The various component attributes all return what you'd expect. I still think the value added by making window.location be

Re: Intent to implement and ship: document.origin

2015-03-19 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote: On 3/18/15 2:39 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: Other than the location object tracking a URL you might not expect And not having .searchParams. That is in our implementation and still an outstanding issue in the

Re: Intent to Ship: 3rd Party Install Tracking

2015-03-19 Thread Mark Finkle
Valid point On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 9:22 AM, Robert Kaiser ka...@kairo.at wrote: Mark Finkle schrieb: and maybe we should use it for the FHR persistent ID since it's the same across installs and profile-resets I think it's a *very* bad idea privacy-wise to use the same ID across

Re: Review problems

2015-03-19 Thread Gabor Krizsanits
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 4:47 PM, Gavin Sharp ga...@gavinsharp.com wrote: This is a difficult problem to discuss in the abstract. It should never be the case that you are waiting for weeks/months - you should either be getting reviews within a week (at worst), or be getting responses saying

Re: Intent to Ship: 3rd Party Install Tracking

2015-03-19 Thread Robert Kaiser
Mark Finkle schrieb: and maybe we should use it for the FHR persistent ID since it's the same across installs and profile-resets I think it's a *very* bad idea privacy-wise to use the same ID across different data collection services as that opens up all the scary cross-system-user-tracking

Re: Intent to implement and ship: document.origin

2015-03-19 Thread Boris Zbarsky
On 3/19/15 3:16 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: That is in our implementation Yes, because it was a security bug as specified, iirc. Of course no one else implements searchParams at all, or plans to. But as long as we're talking implementations, last I checked no one else even implemented

Re: Review problems

2015-03-19 Thread Boris Zbarsky
On 3/19/15 7:07 AM, David Rajchenbach-Teller wrote: - encourage developers to say no, either to high-priority features or to review requests, when they can't cope – this includes emulating bz' I do not accept review requests at the moment; Note that as of a week or so ago Bugzilla has a

Re: Review problems

2015-03-19 Thread Gavin Sharp
No doubt that things do not always go smoothly in practice. :) I was describing the ideal that we should be striving for, and the general process we should use to address problem cases (which will inevitably occur). As you point out, escalation can have some negative connotations, but it doesn't