On 5 July 2015 at 11:53, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 5:11 PM, Anne van Kesteren
> wrote:
> > Is there a reason we shouldn't expose a hook for this?
>
> On the one hand, this seems really useful. On the other hand, I'm
> pretty worried about the UX implications here. I wouldn'
On 07/05/2015 06:11 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
A while back there have been some requests from developers (seconded
by those working on GitHub) to have an API to indicate whether a site
is busy with one thing or another (e.g. networking).
They'd like to use this to avoid having to create their
[CCing m.d.platform, since it might be helpful for layout tests there, too.]
I've been reviewing some tests lately, and there are three things that
would help a lot in a correct and efficient review.
#1: Good indentation.
The contents of each block should be indented. It's much harder to
re
On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 6:21 PM, fantasai wrote:
> On 07/05/2015 11:11 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>> A while back there have been some requests from developers (seconded
>> by those working on GitHub) to have an API to indicate whether a site
>> is busy with one thing or another (e.g. networking)
On 07/05/2015 11:11 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
A while back there have been some requests from developers (seconded
by those working on GitHub) to have an API to indicate whether a site
is busy with one thing or another (e.g. networking).
They'd like to use this to avoid having to create their
On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 5:11 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> Is there a reason we shouldn't expose a hook for this?
On the one hand, this seems really useful. On the other hand, I'm
pretty worried about the UX implications here. I wouldn't want a dozen
flashing/spinning/moving things in my tab bar.
A while back there have been some requests from developers (seconded
by those working on GitHub) to have an API to indicate whether a site
is busy with one thing or another (e.g. networking).
They'd like to use this to avoid having to create their own UI. In
Firefox this could manifest itself by t
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 3:56 PM, Neil wrote:
> Aryeh Gregor wrote:
>
>> we still want a new type for function parameters that accepts implicit
>> conversions from nsRefPtr/nsCOMPtr, to use instead of raw pointers.
>>
> Sure, but that won't stop someone from writing Arg foo = ReturnFoo2();
> will it
8 matches
Mail list logo