There seem to be an interesting section in Promises doc from 2001 about
multi-state promises -
https://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/promises-guide#state-transitions
One of the things that we are working on is a spec for loading localization
resources into HTML, which resembles the example from this
Have you tried
./mach package
?
On 22/09/15 07:09, aesop8...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi, Mike
>
> i'm using MozillaBuild 2.0. and to make installer run the command after build.
>
> ../build/pymake/make.py installer
>
> resulting massages as follows.
>
> c:\mozilla-releases38\config\baseconfig.mk:
2014년 6월 25일 수요일 오전 9시 21분 53초 UTC+9, Mike Hommey 님의 말:
> Hi,
>
> If you're building on Windows, you may have heard about pymake. It has
> been our make replacement for builds for a long while, until a few
> months back when we introduced mozmake.
>
> I just landed bug 1027890, which retires supp
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 8:48 PM, Eric Shepherd
wrote:
> Eric Rescorla wrote:
>
> I think there are some fairly obvious issues here, including:
>
> - There are obvious sensitive files you shouldn't upload under
> basically any conditions.
> - It's hard for the client to know what the implication
Eric Rescorla wrote:
> I think there are some fairly obvious issues here, including:
>
> - There are obvious sensitive files you shouldn't upload under
> basically any conditions.
> - It's hard for the client to know what the implications of any directory
> upload are
> because they may not kno
Can you post some links from your about:crashes?
-Jeff
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 7:31 PM, Dhon Buenaventura wrote:
> Why does Firefox Nightly keep crashing randomly? I am currently using the
> latest build but I still experience random crashes.
> ___
> d
Why does Firefox Nightly keep crashing randomly? I am currently using the
latest build but I still experience random crashes.
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 3:58 PM, Jonathan Watt wrote:
> On 21/09/2015 19:57, Eric Rescorla wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>>
>> Note that this, similarly to clipboard integration, is already exposed
>>> to the web through flash. So the main goal of this featur
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 6:58 PM, Jonathan Watt wrote:
> On 21/09/2015 19:57, Eric Rescorla wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>>
>> Note that this, similarly to clipboard integration, is already exposed
>>> to the web through flash. So the main goal of this featur
On 21/09/2015 19:57, Eric Rescorla wrote:
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
Note that this, similarly to clipboard integration, is already exposed
to the web through flash. So the main goal of this feature is to
enable developers to migrate off of flash and instead use Gec
On 21/09/2015 19:31, Eric Shepherd wrote:
Jonas Sicking wrote:
Note that this, similarly to clipboard integration, is already exposed
to the web through flash. So the main goal of this feature is to
enable developers to migrate off of flash and instead use Gecko.
That said, if there are ways we
That's a good question. There's been a bunch of discussion about this in
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=907707
On 21/09/2015 16:49, Eric Rescorla wrote:
This seems like a fantastically dangerous feature and ripe for abuse.
Are we doing anything in the UI to make very clear to use
Jan just disabled __noSucnMethod__ on Nightly (Firefox 44).
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 6:10 PM, Joshua Cranmer 🐧
wrote:
> On 3/6/2015 10:44 AM, Jan De Mooij wrote:
>
>> We've deprecated [0] __noSuchMethod__ [1] support in SpiderMonkey. It's a
>> non-standard feature that no other engine supports, an
On 09/21/2015 05:37 PM, Jonathan Watt wrote:
Targeting Firefox 44 we intend to ship[1] Directory Upload[2],
It seems there are many security, privacy and UI issues discussed in
bug 907707 that are still unresolved. I see that it's blocking the
ship-it tracking bug, but it seems premature to di
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> Note that this, similarly to clipboard integration, is already exposed
> to the web through flash. So the main goal of this feature is to
> enable developers to migrate off of flash and instead use Gecko.
>
I'm not sure that this is the ri
Jonas Sicking wrote:
> Note that this, similarly to clipboard integration, is already exposed
> to the web through flash. So the main goal of this feature is to
> enable developers to migrate off of flash and instead use Gecko.
>
> That said, if there are ways we can improve the UI here to further
Note that this, similarly to clipboard integration, is already exposed
to the web through flash. So the main goal of this feature is to
enable developers to migrate off of flash and instead use Gecko.
That said, if there are ways we can improve the UI here to further
explain to users what is going
This seems like a fantastically dangerous feature and ripe for abuse.
Are we doing anything in the UI to make very clear to users what's going on?
Is there going to be a way to disable it?
-Ekr
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 8:37 AM, Jonathan Watt wrote:
> Targeting Firefox 44 we intend to ship[1] D
Targeting Firefox 44 we intend to ship[1] Directory Upload[2], which provides
directory picking (via ) and directory drag-and-drop.
Our implementation has been developed behind the `dom.input.dirpicker`
preference, enabled only in Nightly builds so far.
In addition to previously announcing our
Hi everyone,
Here's the list of new issues found and filed by the Desktop Manual QA
team last week (Week 38: September 14 - September 18).
Additional details on the team's priorities last week, as well as the
plans for the current week can be found at:
https://etherpad.mozilla.org/DesktopMan
20 matches
Mail list logo
