--
此致
礼
罗勇刚
Yours
sincerely,
Yonggang Luo
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
No, js-ctypes does not have any support for calling methods on C++
classes. In fact, that functionality was WONTFIXed a while back:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=505907.
-Ted
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
OK, I've done it with my own patch, indeed, I just want to calling C APIs
with
XPCOM pointers. So I implemented the following function to deal with my
situation:
512020db461367413e46bfeb3af8b70ed45e01f8
xpcom/components/nsComponentManager.cpp | 14 ++
Thanks for everyone's help!
I did just want to clarify, though, that I don't think anyone should be
changing holiday plans to work these bugs. We can address them as people
come back from PTO. Everyone having a good break and holiday is more
important.
Sorry for any confusion and thanks again.
On 23/12/15 01:15, Ben Kelly wrote:
Hi all,
In an attempt to wrangle some of the orange plaguing the tree I've tried to
triage the top unowned bugs by team.
ateam/releng:
[…]
10) https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1231798
This is a web-platform-tests test which is an interesting
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 7:15 PM, Ben Kelly wrote:
>
> devtools:
> 21) https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=992275
> 22) https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1210208
> 23) https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1230031
> 29)
For the record it seems like even if adding new jobs via TH fails, the
old try-extender tool at http://try-extender.herokuapp.com/ still
works (at least for try pushes).
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 2:56 PM, Armen Zambrano G. wrote:
> Hello team,
> Thanks for using the ability of
// nsIComponentManager
exports.getPointerForInterface = (obj, iid) => {
return components.manager.getPointerForInterface(obj, iid)
}
xul.js:
'use strict'
const { Cc, Ci } = require('chrome')
exports.types = require('./types.js')
const {
ctypes,
EnumType,
default_abi,
uint32_t
}
On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 6:58 AM, James Graham wrote:
> On 23/12/15 01:15, Ben Kelly wrote:
[...]
>> 10) https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1231798
>
>
> This is a web-platform-tests test which is an interesting case. De-facto I
> am on point for all problems in
On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 4:37 AM, Marcello Stanisci <
marcello.stani...@inria.fr> wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> Would it be possible to emulate what the 'backgroud' page does
> in the context of a "normal" Firefox extension by using Web workers?
>
> In detail, WebExtensions dictates that each extension
On 12/23/15 8:09 AM, 罗勇刚(Yonggang Luo) wrote:
>No, js-ctypes does not have any support for calling methods on C++
>classes. In fact, that functionality was WONTFIXed a while back:
>https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=505907.
OK, I've done it with my own patch, indeed, I just want to
Hi list,
Would it be possible to emulate what the 'backgroud' page does
in the context of a "normal" Firefox extension by using Web workers?
In detail, WebExtensions dictates that each extension has a background
thread which runs independently of its foreground counterpart, and that
they notify
12 matches
Mail list logo