On Mon, Jul 11, 2016, at 04:26 PM, Martin Thomson wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 2:18 PM, Xidorn Quan wrote:
> > I also use checkin-needed for small changes which I don't think it's
> > worth to run a full testset for, to save some infra resources.
>
> Hmm, that's an odd optimization. I'd have
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 2:18 PM, Xidorn Quan wrote:
> Isn't it still necessary for people who don't yet have permission to
> push?
That suggests to me that there are missing safeguards on autoland.
Otherwise we could just enable it even for those with try access.
> I also use checkin-needed for
> On Jul 10, 2016, at 21:18, Xidorn Quan wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016, at 12:29 PM, Martin Thomson wrote:
>> Is now the right time to start talking about retiring checkin-needed,
>> or is it still heavily used?
>
> Isn't it still necessary for people who don't yet have permission to
> push?
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016, at 12:29 PM, Martin Thomson wrote:
> Is now the right time to start talking about retiring checkin-needed,
> or is it still heavily used?
Isn't it still necessary for people who don't yet have permission to
push?
I also use checkin-needed for small changes which I don't thin
Is now the right time to start talking about retiring checkin-needed,
or is it still heavily used?
On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 4:58 AM, Gregory Szorc wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 11:39 AM, Felipe G wrote:
>
>> Is there a way to make the checkin-needed flag generate a template comment
>> (like the
5 matches
Mail list logo
