Intent to ship: IntersectionObserver API

As of March 14 I intend to turn the IntersectionObserver API on by default on all platforms. It has been developed behind the dom.IntersectionObserver.enabled preference. Chrome is already shipping it since 51. Manual QA and fuzzing was successfully completed (

Re: Rationalising Linux audio backend support

Am Montag, 18. Juli 2016 15:57:27 UTC+2 schrieb Ralph Giles: > On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 3:34 AM, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > > I also wonder how this fallback thing works. Things are linked to the > > pulseaudio library, but if the pulseaudio binary isn't installed things fall > >

Re: Rationalising Linux audio backend support

Am Mittwoch, 15. März 2017 00:11:24 UTC+1 schrieb gfra...@gmail.com: > So this is were this idea started! > Great job guys, well, at least firefox is now unusable on Puppy Linux and low > profile OSS. yes, indeed: :( - A developer who don't like work much on ALSA and chose the easy way! (Hey,

Re: Rationalising Linux audio backend support

So this is were this idea started! Great job guys, well, at least firefox is now unusable on Puppy Linux and low profile OSS. ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Re: The future of commit access policy for core Firefox

> On 12 Mar 2017, at 9:40 pm, Ehsan Akhgari wrote: > And I still don't understand what the proposal means with rebases in > practice. What if, after automation tries to land your change after you > got your final r+ the final rebase fails and you need to do a manual >

Re: PSA: Use leave-open keyword to prevent bug closure when integration repositories are merged

On Thursday, February 20, 2014 at 1:41:12 AM UTC-8, Graeme McCutcheon wrote: > When mozilla-inbound was born, it becames custom to annotate the > whiteboard of bugs that were not to be resolved when the sheriffs merged > inbound to mozilla-central. Eventually mcMerge was written for the >

Re: PSA: Use leave-open keyword to prevent bug closure when integration repositories are merged

On Thursday, February 20, 2014 at 1:41:12 AM UTC-8, Graeme McCutcheon wrote: > When mozilla-inbound was born, it becames custom to annotate the > whiteboard of bugs that were not to be resolved when the sheriffs merged > inbound to mozilla-central. Eventually mcMerge was written for the >

Re: Please write good commit messages before asking for code review

On Thursday, March 9, 2017 at 11:47:44 AM UTC-8, Ehsan Akhgari wrote: > I review a large number of patches on a typical day, and usually I have to > spend a fair amount of time to just understand what the patch is doing. As > the patch author, you can do a lot to help make this easier by *writing

Re: PSA: Use leave-open keyword to prevent bug closure when integration repositories are merged

On Thursday, February 20, 2014 at 1:41:12 AM UTC-8, Graeme McCutcheon wrote: > When mozilla-inbound was born, it becames custom to annotate the > whiteboard of bugs that were not to be resolved when the sheriffs merged > inbound to mozilla-central. Eventually mcMerge was written for the >

Is Alt+Shift+F10 a good shortcut key to open context menu forcibly on Windows and Linux?

Gecko supports that user can block web apps to prevent to open the context menu with Shift key. For instance, Shift+Right-Click and Shift+ContextMenu can open the context menu forcibly. Additionally, Shift+F10 is a well-known shortcut key to open context menu. However, this was not working as

Re: Quantum Flow Engineering Newsletter #1

Very interesting stuff. Of course, there are things scaping my understanding but it is good to know. Thank you for sharing, Eshang. El 9 mar. 2017 2:12 p. m., "Ehsan Akhgari" escribió: > Hi everyone, > > A while ago a number of engineers including myself started to

Intent to remove UIEvent.isChar

UIEvent.isChar was (probably) designed for that web apps can distinguish the key combination inputs character(s). However, this is initialized only on macOS (always false on the other platforms) and other browsers don't support this. Unfortunately, Add-on SDK checked this value. Currently,

Re: Objecting to some proposed editor changes

Hi Daniel, Thank you for your mail. On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 4:02 PM, glazou wrote: > 2. it forces to move to commands, while an API remains available > even if the corresponding command is disabled I'd like to understand this point. Perhaps we can follow up on

Objecting to some proposed editor changes

Hello all, I would like to draw the attention about one bug that propose rather big changes to the editor: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1336320 This bug does not seem to make sense to me: 1. it *drastically* complexifies Editor API calls, completely changing the