Re: Intent to require `mach try` for submitting to Try

2017-09-19 Thread Eric Rescorla
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 10:21 AM, Eric Rescorla wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 9:20 AM, Andrew McCreight > wrote: > >> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 8:49 AM, Eric Rescorla wrote: >> >> > Generally no, but this is an unfortunate consequence of

Re: Intent to require `mach try` for submitting to Try

2017-09-19 Thread Eric Rescorla
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 9:20 AM, Andrew McCreight wrote: > On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 8:49 AM, Eric Rescorla wrote: > > > Generally no, but this is an unfortunate consequence of Mozilla's > decision > > a while ago to pick a VCS which has not turned out to be

Re: Intent to require `mach try` for submitting to Try

2017-09-19 Thread Bobby Holley
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 9:20 AM, Andrew McCreight wrote: > On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 8:49 AM, Eric Rescorla wrote: > > > Generally no, but this is an unfortunate consequence of Mozilla's > decision > > a while ago to pick a VCS which has not turned out to be

Re: Intent to require `mach try` for submitting to Try

2017-09-19 Thread Andrew McCreight
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 8:49 AM, Eric Rescorla wrote: > Generally no, but this is an unfortunate consequence of Mozilla's decision > a while ago to pick a VCS which has not turned out to be the dominant > choice (not placing blame here, but I think it's clear that's how it's >

Re: Intent to require `mach try` for submitting to Try

2017-09-19 Thread Eric Rescorla
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 8:40 AM, Aki Sasaki wrote: > On 9/16/17 6:43 AM, Eric Rescorla wrote: > >> 2. There are a lot more people writing code for Firefox than developing >> the >> internal tools, so in general, costs on those people should be avoided. > > > > On Mon, Sep

Re: Canonical cinnabar repository

2017-09-19 Thread Jeff Muizelaar
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 5:02 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote: > On 09/18/2017 03:30 PM, Bobby Holley wrote: >> >> CVS history feels like an odd bar for cinnabar. The goal of cinnabar is to >> enable seamless integration between git and mercurial with reproducible, 1:1 >> commit

Re: Canonical cinnabar repository

2017-09-19 Thread Jean-Yves Avenard
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 4:05 PM, Kartikaya Gupta wrote: > > I've tried using cinnabar a couple of times now and the last time I > tried, this was the dealbreaker for me. My worfklow often involves > moving a branch from one machine to another and the extra hassle that >

Re: Coding style: Argument alignment

2017-09-19 Thread Ehsan Akhgari
On 09/09/2017 12:12 PM, Mats Palmgren wrote: On 8/31/17 6:50 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote: On 08/30/2017 09:03 PM, Eric Rahm wrote: Okay sounds like there's agreement on a). Indeed. I have edited the Style Guide to reflect this. Fwiw, I disagree with this decision. Here's a more realistic

Re: Coding style: Placement of binary operators when breaking a long line

2017-09-19 Thread Ehsan Akhgari
On 09/11/2017 06:46 PM, Eric Rahm wrote: Thanks everyone! This got a bit derailed but it's clear that a unified style for binary operators is desired. I received several emails off-list in support of my original proposal, a few people reiterated their preference for operators on the newline