On Sat, Oct 7, 2017 at 9:40 AM, Mike Hommey wrote:
> Side note: it's sad that side-bar based tab addons now have to waste a
> large portion of vertical space because of the (large) side-bar header.
> Plus, they can't push the toolbar like they used to, taking the whole
> height of the window.
>
On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 05:40:13PM +0100, Jonathan Kew wrote:
> On 06/10/2017 17:05, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> > On 10/3/17 5:18 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> > > So just to make sure I understand the change (and this is a
> > > theoretical point, because I haven't had a chance to try the change
> > > ye
On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 12:15 PM, Randell Jesup
wrote:
> There's "publish an extension that
>
> lets you fiddle the width" (doable today).
WebExtensions can't manipulate prefs other than the ones explicitly
exposed via a WebExtension API. Only "system add-ons" have that power now.
yes! I
>On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 12:57 AM, Lars Hansen wrote:
>
>> even if I don't exactly remember the ID I'm looking for I can narrow
>> it down to one or two tabs and then hover if I need to.
>>
>> Many other sites also have tabs that can be distinguished
>> from the first few letters - if you can see t
On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 12:57 AM, Lars Hansen wrote:
> even if I don't exactly remember the
>
> ID I'm looking for I can narrow it down to one or two tabs and then hover
>
> if I need to.
>
> Many other sites also have tabs that can be distinguished
>
> from the first few letters -
I settled on 110px as well for the same reason.
-e
On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 9:05 AM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> On 10/3/17 5:18 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
>
>> So just to make sure I understand the change (and this is a theoretical
>> point, because I haven't had a chance to try the change yet)...
>>
>
On 06/10/2017 17:05, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 10/3/17 5:18 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
So just to make sure I understand the change (and this is a
theoretical point, because I haven't had a chance to try the change
yet)...
OK, now I have had a chance to try it.
When set to the new 50px default,
On 10/3/17 5:18 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
So just to make sure I understand the change (and this is a theoretical
point, because I haven't had a chance to try the change yet)...
OK, now I have had a chance to try it.
When set to the new 50px default, I see 1 letter of title or less (less,
bec
On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 3:52 PM, Nicolas B. Pierron <
nicolas.b.pier...@mozilla.com> wrote:
>
> I will add that 91% of the session on release have 12 or fewer tabs, and
> thus would not be concerned at all by these changes. So among the 9%
> remaining, 33% of them are using 20 tabs or fewer, and 6
Not immediately useful to us, but there is a C++ standards proposal in
the works for a standard library function along these lines:
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2016/p0412r0.html
Cheers,
Botond
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-pla
On 10/6/17 9:52 AM, Nicolas B. Pierron wrote:
I will add that 91% of the session on release have 12 or fewer tabs, and
thus would not be concerned at all by these changes.
Do we actually know that?
As I said upthread, at the 100px tab width my tabs start to scroll when
adding the 9th tab.
-
I bet Google Benchmark will have what you want.
As a first guess, maybe this?
https://github.com/google/benchmark/blob/master/include/benchmark/benchmark.h#L297
(And if godbolt says they are wrong, please send them a PR :))
On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 9:16 AM, Gabriele Svelto wrote:
> On 06/10/201
On 10/05/2017 01:34 PM, Chris Hutten-Czapski wrote:
I prefer the old behaviour, but I don't have a strong opinion on the
matter. I think it's because I'm used to tab navigation by keyboard
shortcut more than by mouse. I rearrange tabs so that they're close
together.
For everyone curious about ho
On 06/10/2017 11:00, Henri Sivonen wrote:
> Do we already have a C++ analog of Rust's test::black_box() function?
> I.e. a function that just passes through a value but taints it in such
> a way that the optimizer can't figure out that there are no side
> effects. (For the purpose of ensuring that
On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 5:00 AM, Henri Sivonen wrote:
> Do we already have a C++ analog of Rust's test::black_box() function?
We do not.
> Specifically, this isn't the answer for GCC:
> void* black_box(void* foo) {
> asm ("":"=r" (foo): "r" (foo):"memory");
> return foo;
> }
Can you provide
On 10/6/17 5:00 AM, Henri Sivonen wrote:
If we don't have one, how should one be written so that it works in
GCC, clang and MSVC?
Are you OK with it being restricted to a single thread? If so, would
something like this work?
mutable void* taint;
void* black_box(void* foo) {
taint =
Do we already have a C++ analog of Rust's test::black_box() function?
I.e. a function that just passes through a value but taints it in such
a way that the optimizer can't figure out that there are no side
effects. (For the purpose of ensuring that the compiler can't
eliminate computation that's be
Yes, there are related telemetry probes, but I've recently convinced
myself that they won't be able to clearly detect budget throttling.
The probe is TIMEOUT_EXECUTION_BG_MS, and the reason for it not
working is that it accumulates execution over one second, which just
happens to be the time of the
On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 6:15 PM, Jeff Griffiths
wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 6:33 PM, Brendan Barnwell
> wrote:
> ...
>
> > The difference between 12 and 24 tabs is meaningless. My usage
> of
> > Firefox involves large numbers of tabs, frequently exceeding 1000. This
> > use case is
Maybe if you use browser.tabs.tabMinWidth = 80 instead, it can make it work
better than 75 because, with 75, it still loses some extra information.
On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 2:20 AM, Ehsan Akhgari
wrote:
> On 10/04/2017 12:43 PM, Jeff Griffiths wrote:
>
>> Om my system ( retina macbook pro ) 70 is
On 03-10-17 22:36, Jeff Griffiths wrote:
> 2. if you prefer a value for this pref different than 50 or 100, what
> is it? Why?
80 gives about 3.5 to 4.5 characters of context, which seems to be
enough in most cases. 70 is definitely too tiny, 75 is on the edge (I
could probably live with it). 80 m
21 matches
Mail list logo
