I have updated our table:
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Using_CXX_in_Mozilla_code
On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 5:30 PM, Jeff Gilbert wrote:
> Bug 1444274 will bump our minimum GCC version to 6.1. GCC-7 will
> continue to work.
>
> If you build with GCC instead of Clang on Linux, I've
I recently landed bug 1438688, which makes it so that we don't ship XPT
files any more, so they don't need to be added to a package-manifest.in
file. (Instead, the XPT information is compiled into the binary.) I think
it'll give you an error if you add it anyways, but I haven't tested it. We
still
As I indicated, those posts go into detail on why we are avoiding both
comment and more complicated flag mirroring.
Mark
On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 10:14 AM, Ben Kelly wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 31, 2018, 10:09 AM Mark Côté wrote:
>
>> Regarding comment and flag mirroring, we've discussed this before
> To my surprise, clang 6.0 is willing to generate vld1.8 when no
> particular CPU model is specified:
> https://godbolt.org/g/i5PqcQ
This sample for vld1.8 will be valid due to element size aligned.
Also, although this generator generates hardfp abi as default, if using gcc
7 (with -march=armv7
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 3:35 PM, Nathan Froyd wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 3:10 AM, Henri Sivonen wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 2:56 AM, Nathan Froyd wrote:
>>> (Our release builds use -O2 for Rust code.)
>>
>> What does cargo bench use by default?
>> (https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/d
On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 3:27 PM, Gregory Szorc wrote:
> For reasons outlined at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/s
> how_bug.cgi?id=1388447#c7, we would like to make Python 3 a requirement
> to build Firefox sometime in the Firefox 59 development cycle. (Firefox 59
> will be an ESR release.)
>
> The
On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 06:53:52PM +1000, Nicholas Nethercote wrote:
> Thank you for working on this, jgilbert.
>
> I tried to take advantage of C++14's relaxed constexpr for bug 1451278, but
> I'm getting one test job failure on automation, visible here:
>
> https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/jobs
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 12:03 PM, Steve Fink wrote:
> Yes, sorry, a couple of people pointed that out to me privately. And I did
> get that mixed up; I was assuming processors, despite the page specifically
> pointing out "physical cores".
>
> I still think there's something to be kept in mind he
This incompatibility is pointed by W3C's Editing API WG:
https://github.com/w3c/editing/issues/171
Gecko has some specific editing UI of HTML editor.
1. Resiziers of , , absolute positioned elements.
2. Adding new table row/column from buttons.
3. Removing existing table row/column from buttons.
Hello,
Here's the list of new issues found and filed by the Desktop Release QA team
last week.
Additional details on the team's priorities last week, as well as the plans for
the current week are available at: https://tinyurl.com/yaj49dmm
Bugs logged by Desktop Release QA in the last 8 days
Cor
Thank you for working on this, jgilbert.
I tried to take advantage of C++14's relaxed constexpr for bug 1451278, but
I'm getting one test job failure on automation, visible here:
https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/jobs?repo=try&revision=bcd8e01989d987268cfb6beb7f86e948eae3730d&selectedJob=172004924
What is the point you're trying to drive home?
On Tue, Mar 27, 2018, 15:58 Steve Fink wrote:
> Just to drive home a point, let's play a game.
>
> First, guesstimate what percentage of our users have systems with 2 or
> fewer cores.
>
> Then visit https://hardware.metrics.mozilla.com/#goto-cpu-an
Bug 1444274 will bump our minimum GCC version to 6.1. GCC-7 will
continue to work.
If you build with GCC instead of Clang on Linux, I've been told that
the system gcc package for Ubuntu 16.04 LTS is gcc-5, so very soon
you'll need to install a gcc-6 package to continue to build.
With a bump to GC
> Thank you. Was [*2] meant to be a different URL?
Ah, correct is the following.
http://infocenter.arm.com/help/index.jsp?topic=/com.arm.doc.100511_0401_10_en/ric1447333721072.html
and
http://infocenter.arm.com/help/index.jsp?topic=/com.arm.doc.ddi0409i/BABDGHIB.html
-- Makoto
On Thu, Mar 29,
fbertsch helpfully wrote a query that breaks down physical cores into the %
with and without HT enabled:
https://sql.telemetry.mozilla.org/queries/47219/source
>From this we can see that, e.g., 6.7% of systems that report "2 logical
cores" (and ~2% of all systems) actually only have 1 physical co
On Sat, Mar 31, 2018, 10:09 AM Mark Côté wrote:
> Regarding comment and flag mirroring, we've discussed this before:
>
>
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mozilla.dev.platform/Y8kInYxo8UU/e3Pi-_FpBgAJ
>
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mozilla.dev.platform/Y8kInYxo8UU/tsF7UfxvBgAJ
>
> Given that
16 matches
Mail list logo
