Re: Proposed W3C Charter: JSON-LD Working Group

On Sun, Apr 29, 2018, 19:35 L. David Baron wrote: > OK, here's a draft of an explicit abtension that I can submit later > today. Does this seem reasonable? > This looks good to me. Thank you. > > One concern that we've had over the past few years about JSON-LD > is that

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: JSON-LD Working Group

This looks good and clearly covers all the concerns we discussed. Thanks for writing this up. If possible let’s make our answers public on this so we may more easily cite them in other discussions. This isn’t the last we’ve seen of the quiet attempts to JSON-LDify the web platform. -Tantek On

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: JSON-LD Working Group

OK, here's a draft of an explicit abtension that I can submit later today. Does this seem reasonable? One concern that we've had over the past few years about JSON-LD is that some people have been advocating that formats adopt JSON-LD semantics, but at the same time allow processing as regular

Re: PSA: new CopyableErrorResult class

On 04/27/2018 12:14 AM, Ben Kelly wrote: Hi all, I just pushed another helper class that I thought others might find useful. CopyableErrorResult is a specialized form of ErrorResult. Its intended to allow slightly more rich error values to be passed through things like ipdl structure and