Re: Removing tinderbox-builds from archive.mozilla.org

2018-05-11 Thread Boris Zbarsky
On 5/11/18 11:28 PM, Gregory Szorc wrote: You could trigger dozens of builds on Taskcluster and they would all come back in the time it takes a single build to run. This is doable, and basically corresponds to doing N-ary search for N>2. With some tooling support so you don't have to pick

Re: Removing tinderbox-builds from archive.mozilla.org

2018-05-11 Thread Gregory Szorc
On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 7:47 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > On 5/11/18 7:06 PM, Gregory Szorc wrote: > >> Artifact retention and expiration boils down to a >> trade-off between the cost of storage and the convenience of accessing >> something immediately (as opposed to waiting

Re: Removing tinderbox-builds from archive.mozilla.org

2018-05-11 Thread Boris Zbarsky
On 5/11/18 7:06 PM, Gregory Szorc wrote: Artifact retention and expiration boils down to a trade-off between the cost of storage and the convenience of accessing something immediately (as opposed to waiting several dozen minutes to populate the cache). Just to be clear, when doing a bisect,

Re: Update on rustc/clang goodness

2018-05-11 Thread Gregory Szorc
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 5:35 PM, Anthony Jones wrote: > You may already know that the Low-Level Tools team support important tools > and code infrastructure. Lately we’ve also been improving our rustc/clang > (LLVM) story and I’d like bring everyone up to date. > > There are

Re: Removing tinderbox-builds from archive.mozilla.org

2018-05-11 Thread Gregory Szorc
On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 11:01 AM, Ted Mielczarek wrote: > On Wed, May 9, 2018, at 1:11 PM, L. David Baron wrote: > > > mozregression won't be able to bisect into inbound branches then, but I > > > believe we've always been expiring build artifacts created from > integration >

Re: PSA: Avoid Visual Studio 2017 15.7.0

2018-05-11 Thread Matthew N.
On 2018-05-08 6:40 a.m., Ryan VanderMeulen wrote: Yesterday, Microsoft released Visual Studio 2017 15.7.0. Unfortunately, it is currently not usable for building Firefox due to bug 1458247 (internal compiler errors in WebRTC code). The bug was already reported and confirmed upstream during the

Re: Update on rustc/clang goodness

2018-05-11 Thread Steve Fink
On 5/11/18 12:16 PM, Anthony Jones wrote: On Friday, 11 May 2018 21:14:21 UTC+12, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: Do we have a list of blockers (or meta bug) to make the switch on Linux? We're already using clang for ASAN builds on Linux and passing tests. We'll want to switch to clang on Linux

Re: Update on rustc/clang goodness

2018-05-11 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
Hello, Bravo for all this work. Having a single opensource toolchain would be a great gain for us! On 11/05/2018 02:35, Anthony Jones wrote: > You may already know that the Low-Level Tools team support important tools > and code infrastructure. Lately we’ve also been improving our rustc/clang