Re: MozReview ready for general use

2014-11-12 Thread Blair McBride
Gregory Szorc wrote: Support for specifying the base revision to review has landed. Just pull and update version-control-tools and you can use `hg push -r base -r tip` or `hg push -r base::tip`. \o/ Thank you! - Blair ___ dev-platform mailing list

Re: MozReview ready for general use

2014-11-09 Thread Blair McBride
It's quite common for me to be working on a bug that depends on another bug that hasn't landed yet. I'm struggling to figure out how to make this work with MozReview, since everything is lumped into one review group and associated with one bug. ie, I have: * Bug 1 - patch A (this is either

Re: JavaScript Style Guide. Emacs mode line.

2014-01-07 Thread Blair McBride
I'd like to see the removal of the modelines also. A root config file is much cleaner. For the widest possible support of editors, I'd love to see a root .editorconfig file. See http://editorconfig.org/ - it's an editor-neutral config, with plugins for many editors/IDEs (including Emacs,

Keeping automatically-updated local mirrors of repositories?

2013-09-19 Thread Blair McBride
Ohai! I have numerous copies of mozilla-central (and other repos) for various purposes - spread around physical boxes and VMs. Some of them I use regularly and update regularly, others not-regularly. I've been thinking about the amount of time and bandwidth I waste updating them all from a

Re: Are there plans for a chrome js debugger?

2012-11-21 Thread Blair McBride
On 22/11/2012 2:42 p.m., al...@yahoo.com wrote: What's the status of the chrome debugger? Pretty good - it has some rough(/sharp) edges, but I've found it to be usable for chrome work. See:

Re: Changes to JS components/JSMs

2012-10-30 Thread Blair McBride
Does this break the usage of the BackstagePass object? (the thing that Cu.import() returns). We rely on that for various testing. Looking at MXR, it looks like the following test areas would be affected: * Add-ons Manager * Sync * Social API (toolkit) * Desktop browser The Add-ons Manager is

Re: No more egg-info directories in source directory

2012-09-05 Thread Blair McBride
On 5/09/2012 6:13 a.m., Gregory Szorc wrote: $ hg status -u | grep .egg-info | xargs rm -rf $ git ls-files -o '*.egg-info*' | xargs rm -rf Those of you on Windows will notice this doesn't work, thanks to Windows-style paths. The following will: $ hg status -un | grep .egg-info | sed

Re: Moving Away from Makefile's

2012-08-22 Thread Blair McBride
On 22/08/2012 5:58 p.m., Mike Hommey wrote: +1 for Lua - it seems perfect for this. For #1, I find it far easier to read (and write) than Gyp, when it comes to things like conditionals. For #8, we could just ship the entire runtime in the tree for Tier 1 platforms (its small enough!), then its

Re: Moving Away from Makefile's

2012-08-21 Thread Blair McBride
On 22/08/2012 11:36 a.m., Gregory Szorc wrote: I think Lua is perfect for this (it was invented to be a configuration language after all). But, I'm not sure it satisfies #1 nor #8. +1 for Lua - it seems perfect for this. For #1, I find it far easier to read (and write) than Gyp, when it comes