Re: navigator.clipboard

2016-03-11 Thread Hallvord Reiar Michaelsen Steen
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 8:57 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote: > It seemed like there was some really promising explorations happening > for a while regarding developing a better API than the current > contentEditable behavior. Did that go anywhere? http://w3c.github.io/editing/ ? It's still going strong

Re: navigator.clipboard

2016-03-10 Thread Hallvord Reiar Michaelsen Steen
People kindly pointed out to me that the plain-text forwarded message had lost the link to Lucas's draft. Here it is: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1QI5rKJSiYeD9ekP2NyCYJuOnivduC9-tqEOn-GsCGS4/edit# On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 3:57 PM, Hallvord Reiar Michaelsen Steen wrote: > Hi dev-

Fwd: navigator.clipboard

2016-03-10 Thread Hallvord Reiar Michaelsen Steen
Hi dev-platform-people, while editing the clipboard API spec [1] it's sometimes been suggested to forget about the old slightly cranky API and start fresh. I haven't had much response from implementors when such ideas came up on public-webapps, but here's an interesting E-mail from Lucas Garron at