On Friday, July 18, 2014 10:05:19 AM UTC-5, j...@cloudflare.com wrote:
> I selected 10,000 random JPEGs that we were caching for customers and ran
> them through mozjpeg 2.0 via jpegtran. Some interesting facts:
With mozjpeg you probably want to re-encode with cjpeg rather than jpegtran. We
add
> Are there any plans to integrate into other tools, specifically imagemagick?
>
> Or would you leave that up to others?
For now we're going to stay focused on improving compression in mozjpeg's
library. I think a larger improved toolchain for optimizing JPEGs would be
great, but it's probably
On Tuesday, July 15, 2014 3:15:13 PM UTC-5, perez@gmail.com wrote:
> #1 Would it be possible to have the same algorithm that is applied to webP to
> be applied to JPEG?
I'm not sure. WebP was created much later than JPEGs, so I'd think/hope they're
already using some equivalent to trellis q
Study is here:
http://people.mozilla.org/~josh/lossy_compressed_image_study_july_2014/
Blog post is here:
https://blog.mozilla.org/research/2014/07/15/mozilla-advances-jpeg-encoding-with-mozjpeg-2-0/
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.moz
This is the discussion thread for Mozilla's July 2014 Lossy Compressed Image
Formats Study and the Mozilla Research blog post entitled "Mozilla Advances
JPEG Encoding with mozjpeg 2.0".
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https:
On Thursday, October 17, 2013 12:50:12 PM UTC-5, cry...@free.fr wrote:
> Thank you for publishing this study, here are my first questions:
>
> - Why didn't you include JPEG 2000?
We couldn't test everything, we picked a small set of the formats that we hear
the most about and that seem interesti
Blog post is here:
https://blog.mozilla.org/research/2013/10/17/studying-lossy-image-compression-efficiency/
Study is here:
http://people.mozilla.org/~josh/lossy_compressed_image_study_october_2013/
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozi
This is the discussion thread for the Mozilla Research blog post entitled
"Studying Lossy Image Compression Efficiency", and the related study.
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
On Thursday, February 28, 2013 8:16:50 AM UTC-6, Benjamin Smedberg wrote:
> Have we discussed this project with the metrics team yet?
When I started looking into this it wasn't clear to me that people really knew
what they wanted - they just knew why the existing system didn't work for them.
My
I've been thinking about how we might improve access to telemetry data. I don't
want to get too much into the issues with the current front-end, so suffice it
to say that it isn't meeting my group's needs.
I solicited ideas from Justin Lebar and Patrick McManus, and with those I came
up with an
I was working on something for which TimeStamp and TimeDuration classes would
be helpful in simplifying code that deals with a cache expiration date. This
code does not require high-precision timing. In review I was told that
"TimeStamp shouldn't be used unless a hi-precision ms resolution is ne
11 matches
Mail list logo
