Re: LOAD_ANONYMOUS + LOAD_NOCOOKIES

2013-04-03 Thread bernhardredl
hi i tried to create the patch for 846629 but ran into troubles. (from JS the constants are all 0) i have attached a (incomplete) patch at bugzilla. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=846629 Maybe someone can point me to missing part between c++ <-> JS constant s handling? Am Freitag

Re: LOAD_ANONYMOUS + LOAD_NOCOOKIES

2013-02-28 Thread bernhardredl
just to keep this thread up to date. I asked jduell if it is possible to change long to int64_t Am Freitag, 1. März 2013 04:11:40 UTC+1 schrieb bernha...@gmail.com: > Yep, you are right. I assumed nsIRequest would be the only file assigning > these values. > > > > What numbers should i choose?

Re: LOAD_ANONYMOUS + LOAD_NOCOOKIES

2013-02-28 Thread bernhardredl
Yep, you are right. I assumed nsIRequest would be the only file assigning these values. What numbers should i choose? I need 2 flags and unsigned long only provides 32 possibility which are already used (except 25) For me it would be ok to just fix the cookies issue :) But i guess there is a r

Re: LOAD_ANONYMOUS + LOAD_NOCOOKIES

2013-02-28 Thread bernhardredl
i have run hg pull and hg update on mozilla central and still have no LOAD_DOCUMENT_URI. But i can skip 18 if you want. i have a first draft of my patch: (see link below) The problem seems to be that this patch breaks the WHOLE Cookie handling of firefox. (at least it fixes my original sync bug

LOAD_ANONYMOUS + LOAD_NOCOOKIES

2013-02-22 Thread bernhardredl
sry for double posting this to dev-apps-firefox. got a hint that this group would be the better group. hi i'm willing to fix https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=836602 Summary: The rest api should not send cookies and thus now uses the LOAD_ANONYMOUS flag. But this flag also denies (cl