On 2015-02-26 05:57 PM, Mike Hoye wrote:
Instead, I propose that we stand up a variety of old, slow, minimum-spec
approved development boxes, build on them daily. If forward progress
means we need to abandon a category of developers' machines, I ask that
we try to do that with as much
On 2015-02-27 8:46 AM, Ben Hearsum wrote:
On 2015-02-26 05:57 PM, Mike Hoye wrote:
Instead, I propose that we stand up a variety of old, slow, minimum-spec
approved development boxes, build on them daily. If forward progress
means we need to abandon a category of developers' machines, I ask
We will probably need to integrate telemetry to mach :)
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 10:06 AM, Kyle Huey m...@kylehuey.com wrote:
Is there evidence that real humans are affected by this?
- Kyle
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 2:57 PM, Mike Hoye mh...@mozilla.com wrote:
As far as I can tell from Bug
As far as I can tell from Bug 1110236 and my own testing, it's no longer
possible to build Firefox on 32-bit Windows systems. Recent changes to
how we use our linker will reliably cause the error described in the bug.
I've filed bug 1137346 to that effect; I don't see an answer, and I
Is there evidence that real humans are affected by this?
- Kyle
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 2:57 PM, Mike Hoye mh...@mozilla.com wrote:
As far as I can tell from Bug 1110236 and my own testing, it's no longer
possible to build Firefox on 32-bit Windows systems. Recent changes to how
we use our
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 3:17 PM, mhoye mh...@mozilla.com wrote:
1110236
Ah, I see. So the problem is 32 bit Windows on 64 bit capable hardware?
Is that common?
I was thinking we were dealing with 32 bit hardware, which is probably so
ancient at this point that building Firefox would be
This was brought to our attention by a community contributor named Ankit in bug
1110236.
- mhoye
On Feb 26, 2015, 6:06 PM, at 6:06 PM, Kyle Huey m...@kylehuey.com wrote:
Is there evidence that real humans are affected by this?
- Kyle
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 2:57 PM, Mike Hoye
7 matches
Mail list logo
