On 2014-12-13 1:12 PM, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
I said in irc yesterday that SeaMonkey is NOT ready yet, however I see
no reason to change the plan of record. I expect us to have a good
solution in less than a month. (As in yes go ahead and land that patch)
Thanks! For those who are
:14:19 AM
Subject: Re: Compiler version expectations
On Oct 16, 2014, at 3:57 PM, Ehsan Akhgari ehsan.akhg...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 2014-10-16, 3:49 PM, Jeff Muizelaar wrote:
After some discussion some IRC it was clear that our compiler
deprecation
schedule is not very clear.
Now
Syd Polk wrote:
Does MSVC 2013 run on Windows XP? We still support Win XP for the browser; do
we support building on it?
You can't create a stock build on XP since the latest SDK is 7.1 and the
gamepad code needs 8.0 and the DirectX code would like it too.
--
Warning: May contain traces
After some discussion some IRC it was clear that our compiler deprecation
schedule is not very clear.
Now that we’re using VS2013 on trunk and will soon not being using GCC 4.4 for
B2G, I expect we’ll be dropping support for building with VS2010 and GCC 4.4
in the near term.
This is
On 2014-10-16, 3:49 PM, Jeff Muizelaar wrote:
After some discussion some IRC it was clear that our compiler deprecation
schedule is not very clear.
Now that we’re using VS2013 on trunk and will soon not being using GCC 4.4 for
B2G, I expect we’ll be dropping support for building with VS2010
On Oct 16, 2014, at 3:57 PM, Ehsan Akhgari ehsan.akhg...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2014-10-16, 3:49 PM, Jeff Muizelaar wrote:
After some discussion some IRC it was clear that our compiler deprecation
schedule is not very clear.
Now that we’re using VS2013 on trunk and will soon not being using
@lists.mozilla.org list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2014 9:14:19 AM
Subject: Re: Compiler version expectations
On Oct 16, 2014, at 3:57 PM, Ehsan Akhgari ehsan.akhg...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2014-10-16, 3:49 PM, Jeff Muizelaar wrote:
After some discussion some IRC
On 10/16/2014 3:49 PM, Jeff Muizelaar wrote:
After some discussion some IRC it was clear that our compiler deprecation
schedule is not very clear.
Now that we’re using VS2013 on trunk and will soon not being using GCC 4.4 for
B2G, I expect we’ll be dropping support for building with VS2010
On Oct 16, 2014, at 14:49, Jeff Muizelaar jmuizel...@mozilla.com wrote:
After some discussion some IRC it was clear that our compiler deprecation
schedule is not very clear.
Now that we’re using VS2013 on trunk and will soon not being using GCC 4.4
for B2G, I expect we’ll be dropping
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 2:03 PM, Syd Polk sp...@mozilla.com wrote:
On Oct 16, 2014, at 14:49, Jeff Muizelaar jmuizel...@mozilla.com wrote:
After some discussion some IRC it was clear that our compiler deprecation
schedule is not very clear.
Now that we’re using VS2013 on trunk and will
On 10/16/14 12:49 PM, Jeff Muizelaar wrote:
Are there reasons we can’t drop support for these compilers in the 37-38 time
frame?
Firefox 38 will become the next ESR. I don't know if that means we
should drop old compilers *before* the ESR or after, but it should
probably inform the
On 2014-10-16, 5:01 PM, Chris Peterson wrote:
On 10/16/14 12:49 PM, Jeff Muizelaar wrote:
Are there reasons we can’t drop support for these compilers in the
37-38 time frame?
Firefox 38 will become the next ESR. I don't know if that means we
should drop old compilers *before* the ESR or
On 2014-10-16, 5:02 PM, Benjamin Smedberg wrote:
On 10/16/2014 3:49 PM, Jeff Muizelaar wrote:
After some discussion some IRC it was clear that our compiler
deprecation schedule is not very clear.
Now that we’re using VS2013 on trunk and will soon not being using GCC
4.4 for B2G, I expect
...@mozilla.com
To: Ehsan Akhgari ehsan.akhg...@gmail.com
Cc: dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2014 9:14:19 AM
Subject: Re: Compiler version expectations
On Oct 16, 2014, at 3:57 PM, Ehsan Akhgari ehsan.akhg...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2014-10
On 10/16/14 2:27 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
On 2014-10-16, 5:01 PM, Chris Peterson wrote:
On 10/16/14 12:49 PM, Jeff Muizelaar wrote:
Are there reasons we can’t drop support for these compilers in the
37-38 time frame?
Firefox 38 will become the next ESR. I don't know if that means we
should
15 matches
Mail list logo
