Re: HTML mozbrowser frames on desktop Firefox?

2016-01-08 Thread Bobby Holley
Note that enabling a FFOS-oriented API like mozbrowser has the effect of turning it on for web content (with some set of permissions) rather than "for chrome", since that's how things work in FFOS. So any work to use mozbrowser on Desktop should take extreme care not to accidentally expose it to

Re: HTML mozbrowser frames on desktop Firefox?

2016-01-08 Thread J. Ryan Stinnett
On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 12:13 PM, Bobby Holley wrote: > Note that enabling a FFOS-oriented API like mozbrowser has the effect of > turning it on for web content (with some set of permissions) rather than > "for chrome", since that's how things work in FFOS. So any work to

Re: HTML mozbrowser frames on desktop Firefox?

2016-01-08 Thread Tim Guan-tin Chien
What prevents you from using ? Is it because the parent frame is (X)HTML? I don't know what prevents browser-element from being enabled on desktop though -- it's tests are running on desktop, and the actual feature is hidden behind a permission so we won't expose it to the web content even if we

Re: HTML mozbrowser frames on desktop Firefox?

2016-01-08 Thread J. Ryan Stinnett
I have filed bug 1238160 to investigate and hopefully enable mozbrowser on desktop Firefox. - Ryan On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 3:23 PM, J. Ryan Stinnett wrote: > On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 12:13 PM, Bobby Holley wrote: >> Note that enabling a FFOS-oriented API

Re: HTML mozbrowser frames on desktop Firefox?

2016-01-08 Thread Adam Roach
Regardless of technical feasibility, I believe we're discouraging new uses of XUL in Firefox. /a On 1/8/16 04:55, Tim Guan-tin Chien wrote: What prevents you from using ? Is it because the parent frame is (X)HTML? I don't know what prevents browser-element from being enabled on desktop

Re: HTML mozbrowser frames on desktop Firefox?

2016-01-08 Thread J. Ryan Stinnett
On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 4:55 AM, Tim Guan-tin Chien wrote: > What prevents you from using ? Is it because the parent > frame is (X)HTML? Placing a regular, non-remote in the HTML page does work. However, does not work in my specific context according to the policy of