On 9/4/2012 11:09 PM, Nicholas Nethercote wrote:
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 9:39 PM, Mike Hommey m...@glandium.org wrote:
On the other hand, the ccache miss rate is pretty high, at least it is
for me, so in the end, ccache might not be a win at all.
That's what I've found, for my compiling
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 9:39 PM, Mike Hommey m...@glandium.org wrote:
On the other hand, the ccache miss rate is pretty high, at least it is
for me, so in the end, ccache might not be a win at all.
That's what I've found, for my compiling patterns.
Nick
On 8/22/12 6:10 AM, Robert Kaiser wrote:
[...]
esp. given that basic file I/O is often costly (from watching my CPU
usage, a lot of the build time is spent in I/O wait when using spinning
disks - SSDs improve that hugely).
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 12:29:24 -0700, Gregory Szorc wrote:
Yes, I/O
3 matches
Mail list logo
