On 1/14/19 9:09 PM, fantasai wrote:
I have no idea why I did that. Fixed.
Thank you!
Yes, the spec reflects general consensus, and has been explicitly cleared
for shipping by the CSSWG (as of several years). See issue at the bottom
of the intro:
https://www.w3.org/TR/css-logical-1/#intro
On 1/14/19 10:23 AM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 1/14/19 12:58 PM, Mats Palmgren wrote:
Link to standard: https://drafts.csswg.org/css-logical/#propdef-padding-inline
Two quick questions on the spec:
1) 'padding-block-start' is defined as:
Value: <‘padding-top’>
while 'padding-block' is
On 1/14/19 7:23 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
Do you know whether this is purposeful or just a typo?
Dunno. It seems like a typo to me.
2) We are just implementing the padding shorthands for now, not the margin
ones?
Yes, but I should probably just add margin-block/inline while I'm at it...
On 1/14/19 7:23 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> On 1/14/19 12:58 PM, Mats Palmgren wrote:
>> Do other browser engines implement this? No,
>> https://wpt.fyi/results/css/css-logical/logical-box-padding.html
>
> Do they plan to? That is, is the spec reflecting some sort of general
> consensus?
On 1/14/19 12:58 PM, Mats Palmgren wrote:
Link to standard:
https://drafts.csswg.org/css-logical/#propdef-padding-inline
Two quick questions on the spec:
1) 'padding-block-start' is defined as:
Value: <‘padding-top’>
while 'padding-block' is defined as:
Value: <‘padding-left’>{1,2}
Summary: The padding-block CSS property is a shorthand for the
padding-block-start/end properties (ditto -inline)
Bug: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1519847
Link to standard: https://drafts.csswg.org/css-logical/#propdef-padding-inline
Platform coverage: All platforms
6 matches
Mail list logo
