On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 12:15 PM, Alfredo Yang ay...@mozilla.com wrote:
Summary:
Allow web authors to take photo via gUM video track.
Does this have the same privacy protections as current gUM?
Is current gUM restricted to authenticated origins? If it isn't, is it
realistic to restrict it to
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 10:19 PM, Henri Sivonen hsivo...@hsivonen.fi wrote:
Does this have the same privacy protections as current gUM?
Yes. You can only use this on a stream you've already acquired (e.g. via
current gUM, but other APIs also produce streams). You can already shunt a
MediaStream
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.org wrote:
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 10:19 PM, Henri Sivonen hsivo...@hsivonen.fi wrote:
Is current gUM restricted to authenticated origins? If it isn't, is it
realistic to restrict it to authenticated origins?
That's a good idea
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 10:34 PM, Henri Sivonen hsivo...@hsivonen.fi wrote:
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.org
wrote:
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 10:19 PM, Henri Sivonen hsivo...@hsivonen.fi
wrote:
Is current gUM restricted to authenticated origins? If it
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 3:34 AM, Henri Sivonen hsivo...@hsivonen.fi wrote:
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.org
wrote:
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 10:19 PM, Henri Sivonen hsivo...@hsivonen.fi
wrote:
Is current gUM restricted to authenticated origins? If it
It seems like this API addresses at least some of the use cases of our
Camera API for Firefox OS (things such as being able to display a
preview video stream, being able to adjust some picture quality
parameters, etc.).
I am wondering if you know how much of the Camera API use cases this is
I've been steering the underlying
ICameraControl implementation (dom/camera) towards better support
for ImageCapture's usage model for a while.
If we can fill in support for the missing features we currently
use (see CameraCapabilities.webidl)
then I
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 2:15 AM, Alfredo Yang ay...@mozilla.com wrote:
Summary:
Allow web authors to take photo via gUM video track.
Bug:
Main tracking bug, https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=888177
Spec:
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
What's the use case here? Note that in order to build even a
half-decent camera app just for taking selfies you need some amount of
control over of focus. For more advanced camera apps you also want
control over backlight
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 4:22 PM, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.org wrote:
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
What's the use case here? Note that in order to build even a
half-decent camera app just for taking selfies you need some amount of
control over
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
Ooh, that is great! Though surprisingly the API doesn't seem to have
any support for focus or flash control? Was that intentionally left
out?
I think it's just a case of not wanting the spec to get too far ahead of
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 4:45 PM, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.org wrote:
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
Looking at the API though, why is it based on Events rather than
Promises?
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 11:58 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 4:45 PM, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.org
wrote:
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
Looking at the API though, why is it based on Events rather than
Summary:
Allow web authors to take photo via gUM video track.
Bug:
Main tracking bug, https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=888177
Spec:
https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/dap/raw-file/default/media-stream-capture/ImageCapture.html
Platform coverage:
All platforms.
Target release:
late 2014.
Pref:
14 matches
Mail list logo
