Re: Intent to ship: Some of the mediaqueries-4 syntax improvements.

2018-06-25 Thread Emilio Cobos Álvarez
On 6/25/18 11:01 PM, L. David Baron wrote: How does the particular set of features that you're planning to ship vs. not ship align with what other browsers have shipped (or are close shipping)? I'm not aware of any other browser implementing or shipping any of the changes from MQ3 to MQ4, so

Re: Intent to ship: Some of the mediaqueries-4 syntax improvements.

2018-06-25 Thread L. David Baron
How does the particular set of features that you're planning to ship vs. not ship align with what other browsers have shipped (or are close shipping)? -David On Monday 2018-06-25 21:13 +0200, Emilio Cobos Álvarez wrote: > In bug 145 I plan to land most of the syntax improvements to >

Intent to ship: Some of the mediaqueries-4 syntax improvements.

2018-06-25 Thread Emilio Cobos Álvarez
Hi, In bug 145 I plan to land most of the syntax improvements to mediaqueries-4. Some of the features included are: * Allowing operators such as >, <, >=, or <= in media feature expressions, which allows to properly exclude media queries in a way min-* and max-* cannot, like: