Re: Moving Windows MSVC Builds Back To Tier 1

2018-11-20 Thread Aaron Klotz
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 2:30 PM Ryan VanderMeulen wrote: > As was noted in the bug, deciding to explicitly un-support MSVC is a > decision which merits wider discussion and is not something I wanted to > tackle in that bug. > > Has such a discussion been planned or already happened? If not, can

Re: Moving Windows MSVC Builds Back To Tier 1

2018-10-12 Thread Ryan VanderMeulen
As was noted in the bug, deciding to explicitly un-support MSVC is a decision which merits wider discussion and is not something I wanted to tackle in that bug. -Ryan On 10/12/2018 4:08 PM, Dave Townsend wrote: If we've made the decision to stick with clang-cl, why would we continue to

Re: Moving Windows MSVC Builds Back To Tier 1

2018-10-12 Thread Dave Townsend
If we've made the decision to stick with clang-cl, why would we continue to support MSVC builds going forwards? On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 1:06 PM Ryan VanderMeulen wrote: > When we made the decision to switch to clang-cl for our Windows builds, > MSVC builds and tests were kept running as Tier 2

Moving Windows MSVC Builds Back To Tier 1

2018-10-12 Thread Ryan VanderMeulen
When we made the decision to switch to clang-cl for our Windows builds, MSVC builds and tests were kept running as Tier 2 jobs in CI to ensure that they continued working in the event of an emergency switch-back caused by any last-minute clang-cl compatibility issues. Thankfully, no such issues