Re: PSA: New C++11 features made available by dropping support for gcc-4.6 in Gecko 38

2015-05-12 Thread Ehsan Akhgari
On 2015-05-12 7:57 PM, Karl Tomlinson wrote: Ehsan Akhgari writes: On Monday, May 11, 2015, Xidorn Quan quanxunz...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 7:29 AM, Ehsan Akhgari ehsan.akhg...@gmail.com javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ehsan.akhg...@gmail.com'); wrote: On 2015-04-30 7:57 AM,

Re: PSA: New C++11 features made available by dropping support for gcc-4.6 in Gecko 38

2015-05-12 Thread Karl Tomlinson
Ehsan Akhgari writes: On Monday, May 11, 2015, Xidorn Quan quanxunz...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 7:29 AM, Ehsan Akhgari ehsan.akhg...@gmail.com javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ehsan.akhg...@gmail.com'); wrote: On 2015-04-30 7:57 AM, Xidorn Quan wrote: I guess we probably

Re: PSA: New C++11 features made available by dropping support for gcc-4.6 in Gecko 38

2015-05-12 Thread Ehsan Akhgari
On Monday, May 11, 2015, Xidorn Quan quanxunz...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 7:29 AM, Ehsan Akhgari ehsan.akhg...@gmail.com javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ehsan.akhg...@gmail.com'); wrote: On 2015-04-30 7:57 AM, Xidorn Quan wrote: On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 10:14 PM, Robert

Re: PSA: New C++11 features made available by dropping support for gcc-4.6 in Gecko 38

2015-05-11 Thread Ehsan Akhgari
On 2015-04-30 7:57 AM, Xidorn Quan wrote: On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 10:14 PM, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.org wrote: On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 4:14 AM, bo...@mozilla.com wrote: * member initializers Should we have any rules around these, or should we use them indiscriminately? I wonder

Re: PSA: New C++11 features made available by dropping support for gcc-4.6 in Gecko 38

2015-05-11 Thread Joshua Cranmer 
On 5/11/2015 2:29 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote: On 2015-04-30 7:57 AM, Xidorn Quan wrote: On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 10:14 PM, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.org wrote: On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 4:14 AM, bo...@mozilla.com wrote: * member initializers Should we have any rules around these, or

Re: PSA: New C++11 features made available by dropping support for gcc-4.6 in Gecko 38

2015-04-30 Thread Robert O'Callahan
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 4:14 AM, bo...@mozilla.com wrote: * member initializers Should we have any rules around these, or should we use them indiscriminately? I wonder particularly about initializers which are complicated expressions. Rob -- oIo otoeololo oyooouo otohoaoto oaonoyooonoeo

Re: PSA: New C++11 features made available by dropping support for gcc-4.6 in Gecko 38

2015-04-30 Thread Xidorn Quan
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 10:14 PM, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.org wrote: On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 4:14 AM, bo...@mozilla.com wrote: * member initializers Should we have any rules around these, or should we use them indiscriminately? I wonder particularly about initializers which

Re: PSA: New C++11 features made available by dropping support for gcc-4.6 in Gecko 38

2015-03-23 Thread Emanuel Hoogeveen
On Friday, March 20, 2015 at 4:14:47 PM UTC+1, bo...@mozilla.com wrote: I was asked to repost this in a new thread in case it got lost ... I have now updated the two MDN pages (that I know of) to reflect that gcc-4.7 or later is now required.

Re: PSA: New C++11 features made available by dropping support for gcc-4.6 in Gecko 38

2015-03-20 Thread Ehsan Akhgari
On 2015-03-20 11:14 AM, bo...@mozilla.com wrote: I was asked to repost this in a new thread in case it got lost ... I have now updated the two MDN pages (that I know of) to reflect that gcc-4.7 or later is now required.

PSA: New C++11 features made available by dropping support for gcc-4.6 in Gecko 38

2015-03-20 Thread bowen
I was asked to repost this in a new thread in case it got lost ... I have now updated the two MDN pages (that I know of) to reflect that gcc-4.7 or later is now required. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Developer_guide/Build_Instructions/Linux_Prerequisites