Right. Good point to clarify. We're not taking on the ownership of the
patches that need to go upstream, and my original wording could be
interpreted that way. So, we can forward the patches to Skia, for
example, but we'd be forwarding the whole conversation, that the patch
author would
I'm 100% in support of this.
One thing I'd like to know though is how we're going to deal with
upstreaming patches to Skia on behalf of third parties? In my
experience, it's rarely been a case of simply submitting a patch and
having it accepted; there's normally a decent amount of engineering
2 matches
Mail list logo
