On 05/13/2016 10:49 AM, Jet Villegas wrote:
> If I'm reading the dependency list correctly, we still plan to uplift to
> 48 if we can get bug 1264905 fixed in time. Is that correct?
bug 1264905's fix (a pref-unguarding) was just landed, as well.
We could uplift both, if we *also* uplift bug
If I'm reading the dependency list correctly, we still plan to uplift to 48
if we can get bug 1264905 fixed in time. Is that correct?
--Jet
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 10:15 AM, Daniel Holbert
wrote:
> On 12/30/2015 10:40 PM, Daniel Holbert wrote:
> > Estimated or target
On 12/30/2015 10:40 PM, Daniel Holbert wrote:
> Estimated or target release:
> Firefox 46 (current Nightly), or 47 if we need to hold it back a
> release to fix things.
>
> Preference behind which this will be implemented:
> layout.css.prefixes.webkit
Following up on this -- this feature
Yay!
(I agree that it's sad that we need to do this, but still "yay" for
being more compatible with the web).
/ Jonas
On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 10:40 PM, Daniel Holbert wrote:
> Summary:
> A good chunk of the web today (and particularly the mobile web)
> effectively
On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 5:40 PM, Daniel Holbert wrote:
> Summary:
> A good chunk of the web today (and particularly the mobile web)
> effectively relies on -webkit prefixed CSS properties & features. We
> wish we lived in a world where web content always included
>
Daniel, Mike, and the whole compat team, thank you for diligently
figuring out all the nasty details here and pushing this contentious
"feature" forward.
This is a tough balance for the good of our users, and I'm grateful
for all the thought and careful consideration you have put into it.
We
On Fri, Jan 1, 2016 at 8:15 AM, Daniel Holbert wrote:
> (3) False positives: There are many "legitimate" ways that authors can
> use prefixed properties
Yep, you convinced me with this.
___
dev-platform mailing list
On 12/31/2015 11:37 AM, Martin Thomson wrote:
> If we intend to continue to support these,
(We do.)
> and particularly if we
> anticipate more prefixed rules in future
(Happily, I don't anticipate too many more of these -- at least, the
space of -webkit-prefixed features is bounded, because
On 12/31/2015 01:15 PM, Daniel Holbert wrote:
> (1) Dubious effectiveness:
[...]
> (2) Dubious usefulness: Given that these prefixed features will now
> Just Work in Firefox, and given that we're saying they're de-facto part
> of the web & committing to supporting them (and so are all other
9 matches
Mail list logo