On 22/05/13 03:09, L. David Baron wrote:
On Friday 2013-02-08 14:37 -0800, L. David Baron wrote:
W3C is proposing a revised charter for the HTML Working Group.
For more details, see:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2013Feb/0009.html
http://www.w3.org/html/wg/charter/2012/
On Friday 2013-02-08 14:37 -0800, L. David Baron wrote:
W3C is proposing a revised charter for the HTML Working Group.
For more details, see:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2013Feb/0009.html
http://www.w3.org/html/wg/charter/2012/
Mozilla has the opportunity to send
On 12/02/13 21:20, Benoit Jacob wrote:
I agree wholeheartedly with Benjamin and care about this, but I don't have
a lot of time to get into this presumably time-consuming discussion on a
W3C mailing list --- so I'd just like to express support to any Mozilla
representative fighting this fight
For starters, see
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-admin/2013Feb/0178.html
.
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Gervase Markham g...@mozilla.org wrote:
A) Provide a DRM mechanism in HTML5 which keeps them happy. (How
breakable or not it actually is, is a different question.) Have
On 13/02/13 12:55, Henri Sivonen wrote:
I don't think we have this option. Microsoft and Google have editors
on the EME spec. So this option looks more like: Have Hollywood movies
available with good performance and without additional installs in IE
and Chrome and *for the time being*
Gervase Markham wrote:
I'm not enamoured of the idea of the answer to how do I watch Netflix/LoveFilm in
Firefox? being head over to Microsoft and install Silverlight; bad luck if you run
anything other than Windows or Mac OS X.
(AFAICT, that is the answer at the moment anyway, but at least
On 2/8/2013 5:37 PM, L. David Baron wrote:
W3C is proposing a revised charter for the HTML Working Group.
For more details, see:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2013Feb/0009.html
http://www.w3.org/html/wg/charter/2012/
Mozilla has the opportunity to send comments or
On Tuesday, February 12, 2013 11:02:16 AM UTC-5, Benjamin Smedberg wrote:
On 2/8/2013 5:37 PM, L. David Baron wrote:
W3C is proposing a revised charter for the HTML Working Group.
For more details, see:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2013Feb/0009.html
2013/2/12 Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.org
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 5:02 AM, Benjamin Smedberg benja...@smedbergs.us
wrote:
The only really interesting thing in the new charter seems to be the
explicit call for standardizing playback of protected content for the
HTMLMediaElement,
On 2/8/13 2:37 PM, L. David Baron wrote:
W3C is proposing a revised charter for the HTML Working Group.
For more details, see:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2013Feb/0009.html
http://www.w3.org/html/wg/charter/2012/
Is there a way to see what's changing from the current
On Saturday 2013-02-09 17:15 -0800, Justin Dolske wrote:
On 2/8/13 2:37 PM, L. David Baron wrote:
W3C is proposing a revised charter for the HTML Working Group.
For more details, see:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2013Feb/0009.html
http://www.w3.org/html/wg/charter/2012/
11 matches
Mail list logo