Re: Proposed W3C Charter: HTML Working Group

2013-05-22 Thread Mounir Lamouri
On 22/05/13 03:09, L. David Baron wrote: On Friday 2013-02-08 14:37 -0800, L. David Baron wrote: W3C is proposing a revised charter for the HTML Working Group. For more details, see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2013Feb/0009.html http://www.w3.org/html/wg/charter/2012/

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: HTML Working Group

2013-05-21 Thread L. David Baron
On Friday 2013-02-08 14:37 -0800, L. David Baron wrote: W3C is proposing a revised charter for the HTML Working Group. For more details, see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2013Feb/0009.html http://www.w3.org/html/wg/charter/2012/ Mozilla has the opportunity to send

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: HTML Working Group

2013-02-13 Thread Gervase Markham
On 12/02/13 21:20, Benoit Jacob wrote: I agree wholeheartedly with Benjamin and care about this, but I don't have a lot of time to get into this presumably time-consuming discussion on a W3C mailing list --- so I'd just like to express support to any Mozilla representative fighting this fight

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: HTML Working Group

2013-02-13 Thread Henri Sivonen
For starters, see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-admin/2013Feb/0178.html . On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Gervase Markham g...@mozilla.org wrote: A) Provide a DRM mechanism in HTML5 which keeps them happy. (How breakable or not it actually is, is a different question.) Have

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: HTML Working Group

2013-02-13 Thread Gervase Markham
On 13/02/13 12:55, Henri Sivonen wrote: I don't think we have this option. Microsoft and Google have editors on the EME spec. So this option looks more like: Have Hollywood movies available with good performance and without additional installs in IE and Chrome and *for the time being*

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: HTML Working Group

2013-02-13 Thread Neil
Gervase Markham wrote: I'm not enamoured of the idea of the answer to how do I watch Netflix/LoveFilm in Firefox? being head over to Microsoft and install Silverlight; bad luck if you run anything other than Windows or Mac OS X. (AFAICT, that is the answer at the moment anyway, but at least

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: HTML Working Group

2013-02-12 Thread Benjamin Smedberg
On 2/8/2013 5:37 PM, L. David Baron wrote: W3C is proposing a revised charter for the HTML Working Group. For more details, see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2013Feb/0009.html http://www.w3.org/html/wg/charter/2012/ Mozilla has the opportunity to send comments or

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: HTML Working Group

2013-02-12 Thread sdaugherty
On Tuesday, February 12, 2013 11:02:16 AM UTC-5, Benjamin Smedberg wrote: On 2/8/2013 5:37 PM, L. David Baron wrote: W3C is proposing a revised charter for the HTML Working Group. For more details, see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2013Feb/0009.html

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: HTML Working Group

2013-02-12 Thread Benoit Jacob
2013/2/12 Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.org On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 5:02 AM, Benjamin Smedberg benja...@smedbergs.us wrote: The only really interesting thing in the new charter seems to be the explicit call for standardizing playback of protected content for the HTMLMediaElement,

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: HTML Working Group

2013-02-09 Thread Justin Dolske
On 2/8/13 2:37 PM, L. David Baron wrote: W3C is proposing a revised charter for the HTML Working Group. For more details, see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2013Feb/0009.html http://www.w3.org/html/wg/charter/2012/ Is there a way to see what's changing from the current

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: HTML Working Group

2013-02-09 Thread L. David Baron
On Saturday 2013-02-09 17:15 -0800, Justin Dolske wrote: On 2/8/13 2:37 PM, L. David Baron wrote: W3C is proposing a revised charter for the HTML Working Group. For more details, see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2013Feb/0009.html http://www.w3.org/html/wg/charter/2012/