Re: Proposed W3C Charter: Verifiable Claims Working Group

2016-12-28 Thread L. David Baron
OK, I sent the response far enough before the deadline (which is Sunday January 15) that other W3C members may have a chance to see it before the deadline: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2016Dec/0010.html -David -- 턞 L. David Baron

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: Verifiable Claims Working Group

2016-12-28 Thread Eric Rescorla
On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 3:52 PM, L. David Baron wrote: > Here's an attempt to write up comments to submit on this charter. > I'm not sure I understood ekr's reply to mt, though. So corrections > and clarifications are certainly welcome. > > Sorry for the delay circling back

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: Verifiable Claims Working Group

2016-12-28 Thread L. David Baron
Here's an attempt to write up comments to submit on this charter. I'm not sure I understood ekr's reply to mt, though. So corrections and clarifications are certainly welcome. Sorry for the delay circling back to this. -David We don't think the W3C should be putting resources behind

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: Verifiable Claims Working Group

2016-12-12 Thread Eric Rescorla
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 6:37 PM, Martin Thomson wrote: > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 5:56 AM, Eric Rescorla wrote: > > Following up to myself: if the plan is really that people will have a > > single identity that they then present to everyone and that claims hang >

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: Verifiable Claims Working Group

2016-12-12 Thread Martin Thomson
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 5:56 AM, Eric Rescorla wrote: > Following up to myself: if the plan is really that people will have a > single identity that they then present to everyone and that claims hang > off, I think W3C should not standardize that. A lot hinges on the nature of

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: Verifiable Claims Working Group

2016-12-12 Thread Eric Rescorla
Following up to myself: if the plan is really that people will have a single identity that they then present to everyone and that claims hang off, I think W3C should not standardize that. -Ekr On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 8:48 AM, Eric Rescorla wrote: > I took a quick look at this

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: Verifiable Claims Working Group

2016-12-12 Thread Eric Rescorla
I took a quick look at this material and it's very hard to tell what the actual privacy properties are: "From a privacy perspective it is important that information that is intended to remain private is handled appropriately. Maintaining the trust of a verifiable claims ecosystem is important.