On Tue, 6 May 2014, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 5:57 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
Just so we're clear, I really don't care what the name is, nor do I
have any objection to people having private conversations or whatnot.
My point is just that there has not
On Mon, 5 May 2014, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
drawSystemFocusRing is a rather bad name since most calls to it will
draw nothing. drawCustomFocusRing is an even worse name since it will
draw nothing approximately always.
drawFocusIfNeeded replaces drawSystemFocusRing, which is the method
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 8:13 AM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
drawFocusIfNeeded() isn't a particularly good name either, since you're
not drawing the focus, you're drawing the focus ring.
In the old email thread, Jatinder Mann objected to using the term ring
since the focus drawn might not
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 4:13 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Tue, 6 May 2014, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
We could probably come up with a slightly better name, but only very
slightly better, so at this point I would rather not reopen the
discussion. If someone else wants to, that's
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 9:28 PM, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.orgwrote:
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 4:13 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Tue, 6 May 2014, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
We could probably come up with a slightly better name, but only very
slightly better, so at this point
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 4:44 PM, Rik Cabanier caban...@gmail.com wrote:
FWIW the discussion was public.
See
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-canvas-api/2014JanMar/0003.html
Haha, OK, apology withdrawn :-).
Thanks,
Rob
--
Jtehsauts tshaei dS,o n Wohfy Mdaon yhoaus
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 4:10 PM, Rik Cabanier caban...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 11:58 AM, Ehsan Akhgari ehsan.akhg...@gmail.comwrote:
On 2014-05-01, 2:22 PM, Rik Cabanier wrote:
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 10:49 AM, Ehsan Akhgari ehsan.akhg...@gmail.com
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 1:44 AM, Rik Cabanier caban...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
Pointer to the bug?
Reason it's not in the WHATWG specification?
--
http://annevankesteren.nl/
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
Hi Rik,
How extensive is our testing of this feature? I'm very surprised that
bug 1004499 was not caught by a test when you landed this.
Cheers,
Ehsan
On 2014-04-30, 8:44 PM, Rik Cabanier wrote:
Primary eng emails
caban...@adobe.com
*Spec*
Another question: Trevor had some concerns over this API in bug 958241.
Were those concerns sufficiently addressed?
Thanks!
Ehsan
On 2014-04-30, 8:44 PM, Rik Cabanier wrote:
Primary eng emails
caban...@adobe.com
*Spec*
On Thu, 1 May 2014, Rik Cabanier wrote:
No particular reason. The spec text is identical; just the name of the
method changed. Roc suggested the new name and people liked it better. I
believe Ian stated that he would update the WHATWG version when there
are 2 implementations.
There's two
On 2014-05-01, 3:12 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
On Thu, 1 May 2014, Rik Cabanier wrote:
No particular reason. The spec text is identical; just the name of the
method changed. Roc suggested the new name and people liked it better. I
believe Ian stated that he would update the WHATWG version when
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 11:58 AM, Ehsan Akhgari ehsan.akhg...@gmail.comwrote:
On 2014-05-01, 2:22 PM, Rik Cabanier wrote:
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 10:49 AM, Ehsan Akhgari ehsan.akhg...@gmail.com
mailto:ehsan.akhg...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Rik,
How extensive is our testing of this
13 matches
Mail list logo
