On Monday, July 7, 2014 4:44:50 PM UTC-7, Joshua Cranmer wrote:
On 7/7/2014 5:25 PM, Jonathan Griffin wrote:
Filed https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1035464 for those
that would like to follow along.
Perhaps bug 890116 is a better measure of tracking.
--
On Friday, July 11, 2014 3:59:41 PM UTC-7, cda...@mozilla.com wrote:
On Monday, July 7, 2014 4:44:50 PM UTC-7, Joshua Cranmer wrote:
On 7/7/2014 5:25 PM, Jonathan Griffin wrote:
Filed https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1035464 for those
that would like to
Hey Joshua,
That's awesome!
How long does the try run take that generated this data? We should
consider scheduling a periodic job to collect this data and track it
over time.
Jonathan
On 7/6/2014 10:02 PM, Joshua Cranmer wrote:
I don't know how many people follow code-coverage updates
On 7/7/2014 11:39 AM, Jonathan Griffin wrote:
Hey Joshua,
That's awesome!
How long does the try run take that generated this data? We should
consider scheduling a periodic job to collect this data and track it
over time.
Well, it depends on how overloaded try is at the moment. ^_^
The
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Jonathan Griffin jgrif...@mozilla.com
wrote:
I guess a related question is, if we could run this periodically on TBPL,
what would be the right frequency?
We could potentially create a job in buidlbot that would handle the
downloading/post-processing, which
On 7/7/2014 1:11 PM, Jonathan Griffin wrote:
I guess a related question is, if we could run this periodically on
TBPL, what would be the right frequency?
Several years ago, I did a project where I ran code-coverage on roughly
every nightly build of Thunderbird [1] (and I still have those
Filed https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1035464 for those
that would like to follow along.
Jonathan
On 7/7/2014 3:22 PM, Jonathan Griffin wrote:
So it sounds like it would be valuable to add try syntax to trigger
this, as well as produce periodic reports. Most of the work needed
On 7/7/2014 5:25 PM, Jonathan Griffin wrote:
Filed https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1035464 for those
that would like to follow along.
Perhaps bug 890116 is a better measure of tracking.
--
Joshua Cranmer
Thunderbird and DXR developer
Source code archæologist
I don't know how many people follow code-coverage updates in general,
but I've produced relatively up-to-date code coverage results based on
http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/81691a55e60f, and they may
be found here: http://www.tjhsst.edu/~jcranmer/m-ccov/.
In contrast to earlier
9 matches
Mail list logo
