Re: W3C Proposed Recommendation: WOFF 2.0

2018-01-13 Thread Tantek Çelik
Just to add a pair of unfamiliar eyes to this review, the implementation report and test results look quite good: [1] https://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/WOFF2/Implementation.html Only nit: * The decoder test results show a single test "validation-off-012" with no passing implementation: [2] https://www.

Re: W3C Proposed Recommendation: WOFF 2.0

2018-01-11 Thread Kevin Brosnan
Yes we are an implementer. WOFF 2.0 was enabled in Firefox 39, released 2015-06-30. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1084026 and https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/@font-face#Browser_compatibility Kevin Brosnan On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 10:40 AM, L. David Baron wrote: > A

W3C Proposed Recommendation: WOFF 2.0

2018-01-11 Thread L. David Baron
A W3C Proposed Recommendation is available for the membership of W3C (including Mozilla) to vote on, before it proceeds to the final stage of being a W3C Recomendation: WOFF (Web Open Font Format) File Format 2.0 https://www.w3.org/TR/WOFF2/ https://w3c.github.io/woff/woff2/ Deadline for r