On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 2:13 AM, Masayuki Nakano masay...@d-toybox.com wrote:
HTML5 spec suggests the style of abbr and acronym is:
abbr[title], acronym[title] { text-decoration: dotted underline; }
http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/rendering.html#phrasing-content-0
However, we still use:
On 2015-04-22 8:02 AM, Julien Wajsberg wrote:
Inbound bustage should not happen. Try is not a waste of time. The time
you wait for your build result... well you can do something else during
that time, right? If you're really confident your work won't break
anything then you'll likely only wait a
Thanks for the feedback Kevin. I've tweaked the wording and provided
options for the cases where the respondent isn't the author of the
script/program/etc.
On 22 April 2015 at 05:29, Kevin Brosnan kbros...@gmail.com wrote:
This form has some issues. There are required sections of Downloading
On Tuesday, April 21, 2015 at 10:51:58 PM UTC-4, David Anderson wrote:
We're interested in any significant behavior changes with APZ, and especially
any situations in which we can't pre-render content fast enough. In this case
you might see blank white areas of the screen while scrolling (aka
2 files summing to 90 MB of binary data (a Firefox installer) were checked
into fx-team a few hours ago.
While Mercurial (and Git) can handle binary files of this size,
transferring excessively large files adds overhead to systems and is a
barrier to contributors on slow connections. We therefore
Should we have a hook to catch this kind of thing?
-Jeff
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 1:44 PM, Gregory Szorc g...@mozilla.com wrote:
2 files summing to 90 MB of binary data (a Firefox installer) were checked
into fx-team a few hours ago.
While Mercurial (and Git) can handle binary files of this
Yes and there is now bug 1157367 for that.
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Jeff Muizelaar jmuizel...@mozilla.com
wrote:
Should we have a hook to catch this kind of thing?
-Jeff
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 1:44 PM, Gregory Szorc g...@mozilla.com wrote:
2 files summing to 90 MB of binary data
On 2015/04/22 22:15, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
Note that it's not just the turn around time that can become an issue.
For me personally the reasons I choose to not use the try server are:
1) If I have ~20 unlanded patches in my queue (which is normal for my
workflow on an average day), I need to
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 1:02 AM, Christopher Lord cl...@mozilla.com wrote:
down. I'm not a huge fan of all aspects of their proposal, so I've made my
own: http://chrislord.net/?p=273preview=1_ppp=0afe20d87f
Seems the link is outdated?
___
On 23/04/2015 01:44, Gregory Szorc wrote:
2 files summing to 90 MB of binary data (a Firefox installer) were
checked into fx-team a few hours ago.
While Mercurial (and Git) can handle binary files of this size,
transferring excessively large files adds overhead to systems and is
a barrier
Bobby Holley schrieb:
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 3:32 PM, Nick Fitzgerald nfitzger...@mozilla.com
wrote:
And this can surely be done via private channels, without public shaming
and the potential negatives people have listed elsewhere in the thread,
right?
How, exactly?I want the ability
On 2015-04-21 1:29 PM, Kevin Brosnan wrote:
This form has some issues. There are required sections of Downloading with
scripts and other programs that only make sense for developers of the
script or download tool.
- Which protocols do you use ? (no idea whatever mozregression uses)
-
On Wednesday, April 22, 2015 at 3:58:17 AM UTC-4, James May wrote:
On 22 April 2015 at 12:51, David Anderson @gmail.com wrote:
To get some feedback on AsyncPanZoom we are enabling it on tonight's
nightly, for Windows only. It will be re-disabled in the next nightly.
For those
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 5:50 PM, Christopher Lord cl...@mozilla.com wrote:
That sounds like a nice idea, though I wonder how you'd specify the duration
of the application of the stylesheet via a media query?
I would put it in the stylesheet somehow I think. Putting yet more
style in markup as
在 2013年12月10日星期二 UTC+8下午5:28:21，Chris Pearce写道：
Hi All,
Can we start using C++ STL containers like std::set, std::map,
std::queue in Mozilla code please? Many of the STL containers are more
convenient to use than our equivalents, and more familiar to new
contributors.
I understand
On 22 April 2015 at 12:51, David Anderson bailo...@gmail.com wrote:
To get some feedback on AsyncPanZoom we are enabling it on tonight's
nightly, for Windows only. It will be re-disabled in the next nightly.
For those unfamiliar, APZ makes scrolling responsive by pre-rendering more
content
Bustage is not in any dictionary, breakage is.
On 2015-04-22 03:58, dev-platform-requ...@lists.mozilla.org wrote:
Send dev-platform mailing list submissions to
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
On 22/04/2015 01:26, Mike Hommey wrote:
Here are a few crude stats, gathered over the last 25271 changesets,
assuming my pattern matching worked properly:
- 1438 changesets were backed out (~5.7%)
Thank you for some stats, which is clearly better than no stats at all!
(Like everyone else who
Enabled it manually and this is so much nicer... Can't wait for this to be
the default :) Some odd behaviour I've noticed already, on Facebook.com the
site seems to occasionally layout as if the scroll-bar wasn't there (so
underneath it), and it seems to flip randomly as you scroll, for a while.
HTML5 spec suggests the style of abbr and acronym is:
abbr[title], acronym[title] { text-decoration: dotted underline; }
http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/rendering.html#phrasing-content-0
However, we still use:
abbr[title], acronym[title] { border-block-end: dotted 1px; }
Our style has trouble with
Actually, forget just facebook, I'm seeing this on lots of sites. It
exhibits quite badly on wiki.mozilla.org too, for example.
--Chris
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 10:06 AM, Christopher Lord cl...@mozilla.com
wrote:
Enabled it manually and this is so much nicer... Can't wait for this to be
the
Le 22/04/2015 13:13, Gijs Kruitbosch a écrit :
On 22/04/2015 01:26, Mike Hommey wrote:
Here are a few crude stats, gathered over the last 25271 changesets,
assuming my pattern matching worked properly:
- 1438 changesets were backed out (~5.7%)
Thank you for some stats, which is clearly
22 matches
Mail list logo
