Re: About static analyzers on some various projects

On 2015-09-25 10:06 AM, Robert O'Callahan wrote: On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 1:46 AM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote: Our static analysis builds can be easily triggered from the try server (although I have been unable to get anyone interested to fix bug 1116518 to make those builds

Re: About static analyzers on some various projects

On 9/25/15 7:06 AM, Robert O'Callahan wrote: [...]I'm not quite sure what it would take to get those build failures to appear in MozReview but it should be possible. The tricky bit is to determine which failures were introduced by the patch, and just display those, and display them in the

Re: About static analyzers on some various projects

On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 10:06 AM, Robert O'Callahan wrote: > On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 1:46 AM, Ehsan Akhgari > wrote: > > Our static analysis builds can be easily triggered from the try server >> (although I have been unable to get anyone interested

Re: git-bz-moz and Bugzilla 2 factor authentication

I have now updated the git-bz-moz and moz-git-tools repositories with my REST API rewrite. Let me know if you have any problems or feedback (I'm mccr8 on IRC). Thanks to everybody who gave me feedback, and to froydnj who looked over the many patches. Andrew On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 1:49 PM,

Re: NPAPI plug-in use case: live video broadcast

On Saturday, September 19, 2015 at 8:15:50 PM UTC+2, Eric Rescorla wrote: > On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 11:09 AM, Oliver Lietz wrote: > > > Hi, > > our nanoStream plugin supports live encoding and streaming with > > h264/aac/rtmp from live camera sources and capture devices. > > We

Re: About static analyzers on some various projects

On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 11:46 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote: > > Our static analysis builds can be easily triggered from the try server > (although I have been unable to get anyone interested to fix bug 1116518 to > make those builds happen on the try server by default, which

Re: NPAPI plug-in use case: live video broadcast

On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 10:20 AM, wrote: > MSE is playback only, so no option for live broadcast. > What do you mean? There doesn't seem to be any reason why MSE can't do live broadcast. If you're using HLS, you can use MSE. https://github.com/dailymotion/hls.js > WebRTC

Re: About static analyzers on some various projects

On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 7:34 AM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote: > On 2015-09-25 12:01 PM, Justin Dolske wrote: > >> At Mozilla, it seems like previous discussions on this kind of thing >> (style and warnings come to mind) have dealt with this at a >> file/directory/module level...

Re: NPAPI plug-in use case: live video broadcast

On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 3:20 PM, wrote: > On Saturday, September 19, 2015 at 8:15:50 PM UTC+2, Eric Rescorla wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 11:09 AM, Oliver Lietz wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > our nanoStream plugin supports live encoding and streaming

Re: NPAPI plug-in use case: live video broadcast

On Sep 26, 2015 09:33, "Eric Rescorla" wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 3:20 PM, wrote: > > > On Saturday, September 19, 2015 at 8:15:50 PM UTC+2, Eric Rescorla wrote: > > > On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 11:09 AM, Oliver Lietz wrote: > > > > > >

Re: About static analyzers on some various projects

On 2015-09-25 5:35 AM, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: Le 24/09/2015 23:29, Ehsan Akhgari a écrit : On 2015-09-24 1:41 PM, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: = Static analyzers = For now, we are running: * Coverity, a proprietary tool with a great (but slow) web interface. As Firefox is Free software, the service

Re: About static analyzers on some various projects

Le 24/09/2015 23:29, Ehsan Akhgari a écrit : > On 2015-09-24 1:41 PM, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: >> = Static analyzers = >> For now, we are running: >> * Coverity, a proprietary tool with a great (but slow) web interface. As >> Firefox is Free software, the service is provided for free >> but with a

Re: Considering dropping Talos support for Linux32

On 2015-09-24 10:55 PM, Justin Dolske wrote: On 9/24/15 6:55 PM, Robert O'Callahan wrote: FWIW I agree that Talos results for Linux32 are unimportant. Even if there was a Linux-32-only regression, I don't think it'd be worth our developers spending time on it. I agree. Kill them. +1.

Re: About static analyzers on some various projects

On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 1:46 AM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote: > Our static analysis builds can be easily triggered from the try server > (although I have been unable to get anyone interested to fix bug 1116518 to > make those builds happen on the try server by default, which

Re: About static analyzers on some various projects

On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 12:19 AM, Robert O'Callahan wrote: > On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 5:41 AM, Sylvestre Ledru > wrote: > > > Any questions, comments? > > > > This whitepaper on Infer is an interesting read: > >