Re: Date, time, week, month and datetime attributes in the in Firefox

On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 6:57 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: > On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 12:36 AM, Xidorn Quan wrote: >> Authors sometimes just want something usable. It doesn't matter if it >> is not stylable, or it doesn't fit in the UI. When they really need to

Re: Date, time, week, month and datetime attributes in the in Firefox

IMO given the number of people who have complained about the lack of this feature on bug 825294, we should assume it is desirable to have even if unstylable. If somebody claims otherwise the burden of proof should be on them to show data that falsifies the assumption. kats On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at

Re: Date, time, week, month and datetime attributes in the in Firefox

On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Xidorn Quan wrote: > On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 6:57 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 12:36 AM, Xidorn Quan wrote: >>> Authors sometimes just want something usable. It doesn't matter

Re: Date, time, week, month and datetime attributes in the in Firefox

html5test.com gives points for supporting those types. That alone doesn't justifying doing them, but it's not nothing either. Rob -- lbir ye,ea yer.tnietoehr rdn rdsme,anea lurpr edna e hnysnenh hhe uresyf toD selthor stor edna siewaoeodm or v sstvr esBa kbvted,t rdsme,aoreseoouoto o l

Re: W3C Proposed Recommendations: Canvas 2D Context & W3C DOM4

On Wednesday 2015-10-21 11:38 -0400, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > On 10/20/15 6:13 PM, L. David Baron wrote: > > W3C DOM4 > > http://www.w3.org/TR/dom/ > > deadline: November 3, 2015 > > > >Both specifications are derived from upstream WHATWG specifications. > > As of which date? > > I ask